Search for: "In re Michael D. (2002)" Results 161 - 180 of 374
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2014, 9:30 pm by Adam M. Finkel
As one of the most widely-reprinted New Yorker cartoons reminds us, “on the Internet, nobody knows you’re a dog. [read post]
2 May 2014, 12:00 pm by Ron Coleman
 As Michael Carroll, now a professor of law at American University put it in this 2002 law review article,  “copyright law has become quite complex and much of the Copyright Act . . . reads like  a very finely detailed contract. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:45 am by Tim Sitzmann
We’re sure you’d love to hear us both eloquently debate and disparage each other’s opinions on just about any topic, but we decided to start with our top 10 fictional lawyers from television and film. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 7:30 pm by Douglas
O blockbuster, dirigido por Michael Bay, é considerado uma grande bomba cinematográfica – nada mais justo, visto que explosões (definitivamente) não faltam no filme. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 7:30 pm by Douglas
O blockbuster, dirigido por Michael Bay, é considerado uma grande bomba cinematográfica – nada mais justo, visto que explosões (definitivamente) não faltam no filme. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:48 am by Schachtman
., Civil Action No. 07–11944–DPW, 2013 WL 4812425 (D. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm by Larry Catá Backer
My article, "The Cooperative as a Proletarian Corporation: The Global Dimensions of Property Rights and the Organization of Economic Activity in Cuba" has just been published and will appear in Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 33:527-618 (2013). [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 8:55 am by admin
” WALKING WOUNDED Willie Boudry, a construction worker, was referred to Eric Scheffey by his company’s insurer after he slipped and wrenched his back carrying pipe on a muddy job in 2002. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 6:43 pm by Schachtman
May 8, 2008) (applying New York law) (relying on Michael M. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Aug. 21, 1998) (citing Daubert II, “‘[d]oubling of the risk’ is the legal standard for evaluating the sufficiency of the plaintiffs’ evidence and for determining which claims should be heard by the jury”), rev’d, 292 F.3d 1124, 1136-37 (9th Cir. 2002) In re Berg Litig., 293 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir. 2002) (companion case to Hanford Nuclear Reservation) Cano v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 12:59 am by Veronika Gaertner
 Gerald Mäsch: “The “Equitable Life” 2002 Scheme of Arrangement in the German Federal Court of Justice”  The German Federal Court of Justice’s IVth Senate, in its decision of 15 February 2012, took the view that the High Court sanction of the English Insurance Company Equitable Life’s 2002 voluntary solvent scheme of arrangement has no binding effect on a dissenting policy holder residing in Germany on the ground that art. 35 (1)… [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 9:45 am by Kelly Buchanan
  Charges (which included some that dated back to the 1960s) were brought under British law but, pursuant to a formal agreement between NZ and the UK and implementing legislation passed in NZ in 2002, the cases were heard by NZ judges who were appointed to the Pitcairn Supreme Court and Court of Appeal. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The Nonfiction Book, Mortal Sins, by Pulitzer-Prize-Winning Investigative Journalist Michael D’Antonio on the Clergy Child Sex Abuse Scandal in the United States A new non-fiction book is a tremendous addition to the fund of our understanding of this crisis. [read post]