Search for: "In re Michael G. (1983)" Results 21 - 40 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm by cdw
§ 1983, or whether such a claim may be asserted only in a petition for writ of habeas corpus. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
CFPB, Justice Kagan accused the majority of deploying an “anti-power-concentration principle” to declare the agency’s single-director structure unconstitutional.[2] She then quipped, without citation, that “[i]f you’ve never heard of a statute being struck down on that ground, you’re not alone. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
§1983 (“section 1983”),[4] and, for that matter, the Fourteenth Amendment’s “state action” requirement.[5] The Court framed the issue before it as a choice between two competing standards. [read post]
2 Dec 2017, 1:39 pm by Wolfgang Demino
No matter what the number of the Trust, it makes no difference in litigation, except that the pleadings are different between the three law firms that have been prosecuting these cases in Texas: Regent and Associates (older cases), Michael J. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
The Case Against The Death Penaltyby Hugo Adam Bedau --------------------------------------------------------------------------------ContentsPrefaceIntroductionDeterrenceUnfairnessInevitability of ErrorBarbarityRetributionFinancial CostsPublic OpinionAbolition TrendsFor Further Information & ReferenceNotes--------------------------------------------------------------------------------PrefaceHugo Adam Bedau is Fletcher Professor of Philosophy at Tufts University. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am by tekEditor
  Furthermore, during the development of the iPhone, Apple was very much aware of the history of multi-touch, dating at least back to 1982, and the use of the pinch gesture, dating back to 1983. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
 It was filed against former Chairman of the Board and CEO Michael Perry in July 2011 seeking $600 million in damages, alleging in a single count that Perry, solely in his capacity as an officer (i.e., CEO), had been negligent. [19]  The complaint in Perry is noteworthy for several reasons including [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 9:05 am by Schachtman
Rev. 983 (2005); Chris Michael Temple, “A Case for Why Silica Litigation Is Not the ‘Next Asbestos’,” Product Liab. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
Labor Secretary Hilda Solis by OSHA chief David Michaels and Deborah Greenfield, acting deputy solicitor of the department. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am by Jack Sharman
Reading Time: 23 minutes Balancing act.My partners Brandon Essig, Jeff Doss, and I recently shared thoughts concerning public corruption trials. [read post]