Search for: "In re Morales (1981)" Results 1 - 20 of 127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2015, 4:18 pm
, it’s not usually important to stand up for our beliefs when we’re invited over to someone’s house for dinner. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 6:21 am
In the United Kingdom and other Council of Europe member states, following the 1981 decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Dudgeon v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 1:31 pm
Which, of course, raises the question of isn't it morally worse, maybe morally far worse, on the one hand, to sell other people stuff you know is such garbage that you won't keep it on your own books as part of your own assets, than to sell them stuff, on the other hand, that you yourself consider good enough to keep on your own books as part of your own asset base? [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 11:29 am by Stone Law, P.C.
Mostly, a decision for Blackhorse would be a moral victory. [read post]
12 Mar 2013, 5:00 am by Ashley Moye
The moral of the story is, weeding in libraries is a necessary survival skill. [read post]
18 Nov 2006, 9:16 am
Morales, convicted of murdering a young woman near Lodi in 1981, later won a stay of execution from a federal judge, who is now considering his challenge to the state's procedures for lethal injection. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:20 am by John L. Welch
She relied on dictionary definitions of "turd," pointing to In re Tinseltown, Inc., 212 USPQ 863 (TTAB 1981) [the wording BULLSHIT is scandalous where multiple dictionary definitions demonstrate that the primary definition is vulgar].Finally, the Examining Attorney argued that “scandalous” as used in the statute encompasses matter that is “lacking in taste, indelicate, morally crude.” [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 2:34 pm by CJLF Staff
Brian Chalk, who has been waiting since 1981 for the execution of his sister's murderer called the ruling a "slap in the face not only to families, but to every citizen. [read post]
3 May 2020, 1:54 pm
  The re-formation of surveillance as a set of obvious understandings, of common meaning, and with with obvious moral value (good or evil) may be more significant than the legal debate about the structures for organizing surveillance and assigning authority over its implementation and oversight across public and private actors, more important than the political and economic debate about surveillance. [read post]
8 Apr 2016, 9:57 am by Jack Goldsmith
There has never been a moral or legal requirement that a country wait to be attacked before it can address existential threats. [read post]