Search for: "In re Neagle"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm
On August 14, 2023, a Fulton County, Georgia grand jury returned a 41-count indictment against former President Donald Trump and eighteen other individuals for a conspiracy to overturn the legitimate 2020 presidential election results in that state. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
In my essay on Friday, I discussed the 1890 case of In Re Neagle as the font of the immunity, but the core concept has deeper roots.Consider McCulloch v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:30 am
He cites Eleventh Circuit cases and the Supreme Court's 1890 decision in In Re Neagle. [read post]
4 May 2023, 10:25 am
Supremacy Clause immunity was also invoked in In Re Neagle. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
On Oct. 5, the Fifth Circuit held in Texas v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 5:00 am
The constitutional arguments start with a mishmash of familiar citations to Curtiss-Wright, In Re Neagle, and The Prize Cases, among other cases and prior Justice Department analyses. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
That is, we argue here, what we’re seeing now. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 1:00 pm
") In a stray footnote, OLC also cited In Re Neagle, in which the U.S. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:57 am
As David Neagle writes in a number of his books: “Sales is not something you do TO someone, it’s something you do FOR someone. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 4:17 pm
Back in June of 2009, I posted that Zachary Neagle had become a client. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 11:53 am
Maryland or California’s arrest of a federal marshal for taking authorized actions to protect the life of a Supreme Court Justice in In re Neagle. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 10:32 am
The case, In re Neagle, led to one of the broadest statements of federal jurisdiction over state jurisdiction ever made by the U.S. [read post]
25 May 2013, 10:16 am
I use a white dot labeled Myers to illustrate a point within that inner core, while I use In re Neagle to illustrate a point within the twilight zone that Congress could eliminate (say, with an express statute governing self-defense rights of supreme court bodyguards). [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 10:02 am
So we have a gaping hole in constitutional authority, not just created by the precedent of In re Neagle, that does not include authority to criminally prosecute federal agents for things they might do. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 10:15 am
The case that is usually cited for that is In re Neagle, 135 U.S. 1 (1890), which held, among other things, that a federal officer cannot be prosecuted in a state court for acts done in the performance of his duties. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 2:48 am
In re Neagle, 135 U.S. 1 (1890) (creating federal officer immunity defense.)) [read post]
