Search for: "In re Perez (1978)" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2007, 2:04 pm
Unlike other copyright scholarship, this piece argues that since the right prevents production of attractive, diverse, cheaper new expression, and blocks the promise of re-mix culture, it should be eliminated. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
So we like to think that by this time we're familiar with all the arguments, pro and con. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:42 am
Josie Perez VelisGroup 18:Migna Sanchez-Llorens vs. [read post]
28 May 2008, 6:42 am
Perez, 83 Cal.App.3d 718, 727, 730 [148 Cal.Rptr. 90] (1978).)A. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:02 pm by Edward A. Fallone
The Evil Spirits of the Modern Daily Press (Puck Magazine 1888)On October 18, 2018, I participated in a presentation entitled “Free Speech and Originalist Jurisprudence” at the University of Wisconsin-Stout along with Professor Alan Bigel (UW-Lacrosse). [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm by Bexis
It was the last blank space on the legal map – the only state with no precedent whatsoever. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 8:27 am by Susan Brenner
JUROR NO. 6: That nobody saw them.THE COURT: You're the only one that saw them? [read post]
5 May 2016, 6:59 am by MBettman
Perez, 2009-Ohio-6179 (If a claim is not raised to the trial court, the claim is thus waived unless plain error is shown.) [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Though I haven’t indicated which is which, I will note that, before Quality King, courts were split on whether the first sale doctrine applied to goods first manufactued in the US and then re-imported without authorization. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Though I haven’t indicated which is which, I will note that, before Quality King, courts were split on whether the first sale doctrine applied to goods first manufactued in the US and then re-imported without authorization. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
., 256 F.3d 1013, 1021 (10th Cir. 2001) (wrong to “construe [a treater’s] ‘heeding’ an adequate warning to mean [s/he] would have given the warning”) (applying Oklahoma law); In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 480, 490-91 (N.J. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
While many consider these general principles to be a secondary source of international law that “may be invoked as supplementary rules… where appropriate” (14), some consider them on an “footing of formal equality with the two positivist elements of custom and treaty”. (15) Examples are the principles of res judicata, equity, justice, and estoppel. [read post]