Search for: "In re R.M.J" Results 1 - 3 of 3
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2013, 7:31 am by paperstreet
., 632 F.3d 212, 218 (5th Cir. 2011) (citing In re R.M.J., 455 U.S. 191, 202-03 (1982)). [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 12:55 pm by Will
Alliance for Natural Health US, 2010 WL 2110071 at *9 (quoting In re R.M.J., 455 U.S. 191, 203 (1982)).Or:“‘The First Amendment does not allow the FDA to simply assert that [a plaintiff’s c]laim is misleading in order to supplant its burden to demonstrate that the harms it recites are real and that its restriction will in fact alleviate them to a material degree.’” [read post]
18 Aug 2006, 2:30 pm by Frodnesor
It evaluated the provision under an "intermediate scrutiny" standard for commercial speech as applied to professional service advertising as in In re R.M.J., 455 U.S. 191 (1982). [read post]