Search for: "In re ROACH" Results 1 - 20 of 259
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2023, 1:19 am by Aaron Moss
As Biden pumps his handcar along the train track, an excerpt from a nonsensical speech of his (think hairy legs and roaches) plays over Grant’s song. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 3:29 am
In re Simply Southern Holdings, LLC, Serial No. 90728560 (August 3, 2023) [not precedential] [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas Shaw). [read post]
9 May 2023, 4:00 am
In re PharmaCann LLC, 123 USPQ2d 1122, 1123-24 (TTAB 2017); In re JJ206, LLC, 120 USPQ2d 1568, 1569 (TTAB 2016); In re Brown, 119 USPQ2d 1350, 1351 (TTAB 2016). [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 2:17 am by Yoshi Kubota
What You Don’t Know About Marijuana News The Meaning of Marijuana News If you’re against using Cannabis as you do not need to smoke you’re misinformed. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 1:04 pm by Lonnie Roach
If you’re unable to work at your old job or learn a new job, Social Security will likely grant you disability benefits. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 3:48 am
See, e.g., In re Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 828 F.2d 1567, 4 USPQ2d 1141, 1143 (Fed. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:23 pm by Jack Bogdanski
I see that Betsy Johnson called Portland the "City of Roaches" in the New York Times today. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 4:01 am
In re DuraVent, Inc., Serial No. 90192019 (June 2, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 6:06 pm by Patricia Hughes
INTRODUCTION When Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau invoked the War Measures Act in mid-October 1970 in response to a request by Quebec Premier Robert Bourassa, I was a grad student in Political Science at McMaster University. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 9:16 pm by Jenny Schell
The re-inspection is to determine the status of the roach population and the progress of the clean-up efforts, and if the establishment can be allowed to reopen to the public. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 3:40 am
In re Snap Inc., Serial Nos. 87177292 and 87211997 (November 3, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
At the appellate level, the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a putative class action challenging Starbucks’ claim that its drinks are the “best coffee for you” and that its coffee is “watched over … from the farm to you,” despite the use of pesticides to kill roaches at certain retail locations. [read post]