Search for: "In re Raymond R. (1994)" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2011, 2:59 am
 We're confident that the kind of preventive action proposed by FSIS is far better than waiting until  problem with non-O157 STEC foodborne illness reaches seismic proportions, like another Jack in the Box. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 2:59 am
Since 1994, only E. coli O157:H7 was declared an adulterant in meat. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 4:20 pm
"According to the UCR statistics, Lynn recorded 15 murders in 1994 - the most recorded homicides in one year between 1980 and 2007. [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 9:56 am
The Raymond and Beverly Sackler Center for Biomedical and Physical Sciences The Raymond and Beverly Sackler Center for Biomedical and Physical Sciences of Weill Cornell Medical College brings together a multidisciplinary team of scientists for the purpose of catalyzing major advances in medicine. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
  Here’s how they work together:Comment b following §908 further states that “[r]eckless indifference to the rights of others and conscious action in deliberate disregard of them (see §500) may provide the necessary state of mind to justify punitive damages. [read post]
3 Feb 2019, 9:05 am by Schachtman
Sugarman, “The Re-emergence of Silica Litigation and the Theories of Liability Under Which it is Litigated,” HarrisMartin (Feb. 24, 2004); Thomas A Gilligan, Jr., “Is Silica The Next Asbestos? [read post]
24 Dec 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
Raymond, chief of space operations for the U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2007, 10:27 pm
Three more things: no Raymond Burr, no dubbing and a coherent plot ruined when Hollywood recut the original Japanese monster movie into a yuckfest. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
Volkswagon-based transfer mandamus order in In re TS Tech USA (Inventive Step) (Hal Wegner) (EDTexweblog.com) (EDTexweblog.com) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patently-O) (Law360) (Patent Prospector) ECJ decides Obelix too famous to be confused with MOBILIX mobile phone service: Les Éditions Albert René Sàrl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market, Orange A/S (Class 46) (IPKat)   Global Global – General Moral rights famous… [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 2:22 pm by Schachtman
Rothman’s complaints about reliance upon “statistical significance,” however, are well-known, and Rothman himself submitted an amicus brief16 in Daubert, a brief that has its own problems.17 In direct response to the Rothman Brief,18 Professor Alvin Feinstein filed an amicus brief in Daubert, wherein he acknowledged that meta-analyses and re-analyses can be valid, but these techniques are subject to many sources of invalidity, and their employment by careful practitioners… [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:11 am by MOTP
Take Payday Lenders and Arbitration as a Textbook Case: What is the Majority Position on Litigation Waiver and Who Got It Right? [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm by carie
Appointed by President Gerald R. [read post]