Search for: "In re Reyna"
Results 1 - 20
of 154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Aug 2016, 6:51 am
You're shocked, I know.Your correspondent last week made some LED-lettering signs for our friends at the Austin Justice Coalition to use at protests and events. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 9:09 am
"They're not my arguments. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 5:15 am
In re: Google LLC, No. 2018-152 (Fed. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:15 am
Apr. 5, 2016) (Before Newman, Reyna, and Wallach, J.) [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 2:15 am
Apr. 5, 2016) (Before Newman, Reyna, and Wallach, J.) [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 5:15 am
In re: Google LLC, No. 2018-152 (Fed. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 11:56 am
"Basically, all they're saying is the victim cooperated. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:05 am
The Federal Circuit panel of Chief Judge Sharon Prost and Circuit Judges Jimmie Reyna and Kimberly Moore determined that the ITC erred in applying res judicata to deny the petition without considering the effect of district court litigation which invalidated the claims asserted in the Section 337 proceeding... [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 4:08 am
Morton who're innocent, imprisoned, and have no other hope for salvation.In other words, the state for nearly a decade since Chapter 64 first became law has been having the debate Mr. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 6:13 am
In In re Staats, a Federal Circuit panel including Judges Dyk, O’Malley and Reyna found that the requirement set forth in 35 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:05 am
The Federal Circuit panel of Chief Judge Sharon Prost and Circuit Judges Jimmie Reyna and Kimberly Moore determined that the ITC erred in applying res judicata to deny the petition without considering the effect of district court litigation which invalidated the claims asserted in the Section 337 proceeding... [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 8:45 am
“The law is pretty clear on what you’re supposed to do. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 2:46 am
They’re gone. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 2:46 am
They’re gone. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 1:27 pm
In oral arguments In re Collins (CAFC 2011-1293), panel Judges Moore and Reyna savaged the PTO for its idiocy. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 8:24 am
By Jason Rantanen In re ESIP (Panel: O’Malley, Reyna, Chen) (link to decision: In re ESIP SERIES 2) This is a short nonprecedential decision in a petition for a writ of mandamus that was issued today but that isn’t on the Federal Circuit’s website. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 9:29 am
Judge Reyna's dissent makes a point that I think courts will find very hard to grapple with, whatever the fate of 2(a) or disparagement specifically: Judge Dyk concurs in the result today only because he believes the content of Mr. [read post]
19 May 2023, 12:43 am
The TTAB’s prior analysis as to each of the DuPont factors was supported by substantial evidence (In re: Charger Ventures LLC, April 13, 2023, Reyna, J.). [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 2:59 pm
In IBM, Judge Reyna joined Judge Hughes’ opinion siding with the defendant. [read post]
19 Jul 2014, 7:19 pm
Legal Reasoning (Lourie, Dyk, Reyna)Our analysis in In re The Proctor & Gamble Company, __ F. 3d __, No. 2014-121 (Fed. [read post]
