Search for: "In re Robert L. (1980)" Results 41 - 60 of 129
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am by Ben
If they think animals should have the right of copyright they're free, I think, under the Constitution, to do that. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am by MOTP
Rueda argues that because the unsigned opinion of Judge Davidson was his first decision, he could not re-determine the merits in a subsequently signed decision. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 8:42 am
  We’re frankly not surprised that something like this has happened. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 7:52 pm by Bill Marler
 Enteritidis infection also increased during the 1980s, particularly in the northeastern United States. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 9:26 pm by Denis Stearns
 Enteritidis infection also increased during the 1980s, particularly in the northeastern United States. [read post]
5 Sep 2015, 6:40 pm by Bruce Clark
 Enteritidis infection also increased during the 1980s, particularly in the northeastern United States. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 7:06 am
In In re Robert L. (1980) 112 Cal.App.3d 401, 404, the California Court of Appeal held that ice picks are indeed dirks or daggers, and noted that they can be used as effective stabbing instruments. [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 9:13 am by Joe Consumer
The agreement, originally forged between George Lucas, Pixar president Ed Catmull and Pixar CEO Steve Jobs in the mid-1980s, was illegal, a violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 3:16 pm by Edwin Komen
  In 1980, MGM released, and registered a copyright in, the motion picture Raging Bull, directed by Martin Scorcese and starring Robert DeNiro. [read post]