Search for: "In re Robert L. (1980)" Results 101 - 120 of 142
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2011, 10:06 am by The Legal Blog
Governor of Delhi (1980) 2 SCC 167 held that a party is not entitled to seek a review of this court's judgment merely for the purpose of rehearing and for a fresh decision of the case. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:18 am by Moria Miller
Reprinted from the Penn Current.David L. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:23 pm
This is a statute in which beginning in 1980, even before the Federal Circuit was created, Congress started amending the law to address the problem of low-quality patents, with the first re-examination procedure in 1980, any number of amendments, including to section 282, the creation of inter-partes re-examination in 1999, and the current consideration of a post-grant review process. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 2:46 pm by Steve Bainbridge
The SEC, in In re Cady, Roberts & Co, 40 S.E.C. 907 (1961), and the Supreme Court, in Chiarella v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 7:33 pm by Kevin Funnell
“We are probably the best capitalized bank in the state,” Charter Bank of Albuquerque President and CEO Robert Bonnet said recently. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 1:38 am
He admitted his adultery and resigned from his race for Louisiana Governor. (2007)[240] Randall L. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:09 am by Anna Christensen
Surveying the landscape of American public law in 2010, most commentators have concluded that—at least so far—the revolutionary re-making of American judicial practice proposed by right-wing lawyers, academics, and politicians during the early 1980s has been only partially successful. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am by admin
“As five years have passed since the large-capacity cesspool ban took effect, we’re working to ensure large-capacity cesspools are closed to protect Hawaii’s water resources. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:23 pm
However, recent studies which indicate the existence of the endowment effect have lead many scholars to re-examine their initial assumptions regarding the importance initial entitlement.[2] II. [read post]