Search for: "In re Roberts" Results 41 - 60 of 15,309
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jul 2012, 7:07 am by Jessie Hill
Gore (the type of precedent Roberts was presumably trying not to re-create). [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 12:23 pm
  For starters, a Happy and Healthy New Year to anyone celebrating it (what the heck, even if you're not . . .). [read post]
14 Feb 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
And that was his position again last week in the Alabama Voting Rights Act case: maybe the Court should re-examine its precedents, but until it does, a lower court shouldn’t be reversed for applying them faithfully.In these and other cases, Roberts has hardly been staking out a strongly liberal or progressive position. [read post]
6 May 2016, 1:50 pm by JB
Even when you’re right, you lose.Huh? [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 10:57 am by rmorgan
The Wall Street Journal, August 22, 2011 by John Letzing http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424053111904070604576516211224146034.html “We’re not rewarding the people bringing products to market,” said Robert Barr, who runs the Berkeley Center for Law & Technology at the University of California, Berkeley, and is a former patent counsel at Cisco Systems Inc. “That’s a net negative for the economy.” [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:30 am by Lawrence Solum
I also suggest that Young's defense of the Roberts Court's decisions requires him to rewrite or re-reason the Court's opinions, and I note that this need to rewrite is something common to defenders of those decisions. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:43 pm
ROBERT GIBBS’ ANSWER: They’re not laughing at us, they’re laughing with us! [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:10 am by David Friedman
For the most part, we’re stuck in the societies we’re born into. [read post]
26 May 2021, 7:00 am by Legal Talk Network
In this episode of The Robert Half Legal Report, host Charles Volkert, senior district president of Robert Half Legal, is joined by Kim Dickerson, a regional managing director with global consulting firm Protiviti, a subsidiary of Robert Half. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 12:19 pm
" Thus, said Roberts, "I think that every justice should be worried about the Court acting as a Court and functioning as a Court, and they should all be worried, when they're writing separately, about the effect on the Court as institution. [read post]
29 May 2010, 4:18 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
I also suggest that Young's defense of the Roberts Court's decisions requires him to rewrite or re-reason the Court's opinions, and I note that this need to rewrite is something common to defenders of those decisions. [read post]