Search for: "In re Rule VII-Admission to the Bar"
Results 1 - 20
of 50
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am
Nothing in the revised rule makes the inadmissible “facts or data” admissible, although at one point, the Advisory Committee Notes confuse admissibility and disclosure when it writes in terms of relied upon information that is “admissible only for the purpose of assisting the jury in evaluating an expert’s opinion. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
Opening up the language of Rule 702 to revision could result in reactionary change, driven by the tort bar’s and allies’ lobbying. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 10:59 am
As a guiding principle, the Court noted that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment bars admissions programs that use race as a stereotype or a negative. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 9:33 am
P. 7001(4)[vii] Fed. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
There, he wrote with respect to Title VII and sex discrimination:What did “discriminate” mean in 1964? [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 3:23 pm
Fearless Fund Unlike SFFA, there is no conclusive ruling on this case yet. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 2:51 pm
The ruling had an immediate impact on higher education institutions, prompting many colleges and universities to re-evaluate their admissions processes and diversity initiatives. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 6:00 am
”[vii] “Courtesy is an essential element of effective advocacy,” agrees Justice John Paul Stevens. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 6:33 pm
That’s why all U.S. employers should re-evaluate their potential minimum wage, overtime, recordkeeping and other Fair Labor Standards Acts (“FLSA”) liability exposure from work performed by workers employed by subcontractors or contractors, staffing, leasing, manpower and workforce and other separate business entities in light of the new Final Rule: Joint Employer Status under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“Final Rule”) on determining joint… [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
If the Supreme Court were to credit that evidence, it could rule against Harvard without necessarily calling into question other aspects of its admissions policy. [read post]
11 Aug 2012, 8:01 pm
Good evening y’all We’re just shy of the 3-week mark since I took the North Carolina bar exam, and one of the things on my disturbingly long to-do list1 has been re-engaging with all the social media outlets I let wither over the past couple months. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:00 pm
In re Asbestos Litig. [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:58 am
Notably, in five of the six circuit split cases that we reviewed, the position adopted by the Second Circuit had been (or later was) adopted by at least one other circuit; in the sixth case, although Sotomayor wrote for the panel in adopting a pro-immigrant rule, the panel ultimately ruled in the government's favor on the facts. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 11:12 am
Sanctions may also be a bar to present evidence in a party’s case in chief. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
Dukes was a sex discrimination class action brought under Title VII. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:22 pm
Conclusions and the Final Rule VII. [read post]
14 May 2011, 3:20 pm
Sperino, A Modern Theory of Direct Corporate Liability for Title VII, 61 Ala. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:57 pm
Disparate impact law does not involve jiggering to get a particular numerical result—at least not in Title VII, where the law of disparate impact is the most well-developed and clear. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 8:01 pm
(vii) On an appeal having been preferred or a petition seeking leave to appeal having been converted into an appeal before the Supreme Court the jurisdiction of High Court to entertain a review petition is lost thereafter as provided by sub- rule (1) of Rule 1 of Order 47 CPC. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:40 pm
At some point, we are veering into the one-drop rule. [read post]
