Search for: "In re S.B." Results 21 - 40 of 170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2018, 8:21 am by Joe Mullin
Voters and taxpayers can only know whether they approve of the actions of public officials and public employees if they know what they’re doing. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 5:33 am by Jon Hyman
” It is identical to last year’s S.B. 351, which never made it out of committee. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 5:33 am by Jon Hyman
” It is identical to last year’s S.B. 351, which never made it out of committee. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 1:27 pm by Dave Maass
This week, we’re happy to report that all of the state’s major law enforcement associations removed their opposition, taking a neutral stance on the legislation. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 6:08 am by Jamison Koehler
I reported last week on his successful appeal in In re S.B.   [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:37 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  DOGGR demurred on the ground that CEQA exemptions applied, and real party Aera Energy, LLC (Aera) demurred on the grounds of res judicata (based on the Alameda judgment) and alternatively, that S.B. 4’s interim statutory regime compelled approval of the permits. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 10:24 am by Daniel J. Slattery
The coffin was already set in place after the Illinois legislature passed S.B.0016 late last year, which was signed into law by Gov. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 3:55 pm by Jamie Williams
We’re happy to report that the bill Governor Brown signed last week was free of the problematic language. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 3:58 pm by Hayley Tsukayama
In a brief filed in October, we told the appeals court that those arguments must be rejected again.California’s Net Neutrality LawWe’re thankful that California’s lawmakers listened to your demands and signed the state’s landmark net neutrality bill, S.B. 822, into law. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 10:49 am by Katharine Trendacosta
S.B. 822 would make getting state money or using state resources contingent on the ISP adhering to net neutrality principles. [read post]
20 Mar 2020, 8:04 am by Caleb Skeath and Brooke Kahn
  This provision may help clarify notification obligations for breaches involving login credentials that are obtained from the dark web, re-used across accounts, or otherwise breached from a third-party source. [read post]
S.B. 176 would restrict solitary confinement of prisoners with mental illness or developmental disabilities, who currently make up more than one-third of the state's solitary confinement population. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 7:36 am by Daniel Schwartz
Together, these series of changes (S.B. 1111 and S.B. 3) will impact employers of all sizes and cases at the CHRO. [read post]