Search for: "In re S.B." Results 61 - 80 of 170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2015, 6:49 am by MBettman
Third, some offenders that are punished with mandatory registration under S.B. 10 fall into the same class as juveniles under In re C.P. [read post]
On May 16, 2019, the California Senate Appropriations Committee held a hearing that included S.B. 561, the “Attorney General amendment” to the California Consumer Privacy Act (“CCPA”). [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 2:22 pm by Law Lady
Legal Malpractice: INSURER LOSES BID TO KEEP SOME DOCUMENTS SECRET, In re Prof'ls Direct Ins. [read post]
31 May 2011, 10:52 am by Gritsforbreakfast
(Sent to the Governor) Re-Entry Strategies ·    H.B. 2889 (Representative Madden): Relating to the expunction of records and files relating to a person's arrest. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 4:00 pm
13 Jan 2014, 10:09 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) That’s what this proposed South Carolina bill (S.B. 878) (sponsored by Sen. [read post]
22 May 2018, 12:45 pm by Jamie Williams
" We’re glad that Google plans to be build transparency into this technology. [read post]
7 Aug 2017, 5:25 pm by Lauren Moxley
Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) re-introduced the International Communications Privacy Act (S.B. 1671), which is designed to address law enforcement access to data stored abroad. [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 10:16 am
"  (If you're looking for more specifics, you're not going to find it in the bill; this is the verbatim text.) [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
R. v S.B., 2016 NLCA 20 [43] If the complainant had denied having the affair and said that she had been truthful in her statements to police, one can see the rationale for defence counsel putting to the complainant, “Don’t these messages show that you were having an affair and, therefore, you lied in your statements to the police? [read post]
18 Oct 2012, 4:51 am by Jon Hyman
To ensure that you do not miss any updates in your reader, please take a moment and re-subscribe to the new feed address (if you have not already done so): [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 8:08 am by Kiera Flynn
In November, Justice Scalia will preside over of the re-enactment of Texas v. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 9:00 am by P. Andrew Torrez
Finally, we’re not sure if’s legal editor, Holly Jones, is reading our “State-by-State Smackdown” series or not – but she’s written a handy checklist for employers looking to draft an enforceable noncompete clause that incorporates many of the stories we’ve been covering here. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 2:25 pm by Ernesto Falcon
Dedicating a greater portion of state resources to them—especially if we’re extending fiber—makes the most sense until they are connected. [read post]