Search for: "In re S.B." Results 141 - 160 of 182
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2014, 8:45 am by WIMS
Petitioners challenge the Memorandum re: the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule on procedural and substantive grounds. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 5:27 pm by Stephanie Lacambra
For example, the rate of re-arrest is often used as a proxy to predict future criminality. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 9:46 am by ACLU
The stakes are high going into this Supreme Court term.In September, five justices turned their backs on the Constitution by allowing Texas’ radical new abortion ban, S.B. 8, to go into effect. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 11:11 am by The Law Offices of Richard Ansara, P.A.
Also last year, the state legislature passed S.B. 280 which eliminated non-unanimous jury recommendations for the death penalty. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 1:02 pm by Geoff Schweller
“We were told ‘We’re too deep into it — too much money had been spent — we can’t go back now,’” one whistleblower told KJZZ. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 5:48 am
" In re Petition for Annexation of 368.08 Acres, More or Less, 706 N.E.2d 1, 8 (Ohio App. 1997). [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 10:37 am by Dave Maass and rainey Reitman
We’re talking to our returning bipartisan allies, among them Sens. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:24 am by MBettman
This classification scheme, mandated under S.B. 10, constitutes cruel and unusual punishment, prohibited by the Eighth Amendment and by Article I, Section 9 of the Ohio Constitution. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 4:30 pm by Mark Walsh
That would be true over nearly three hours of arguments focusing on whether the state had improperly shielded the law known as S.B. 8 from federal court review. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 3:23 pm by Jeffrey Carr
The simplest way of thinking of incorporation is that the courts tell states, “Hey, you’re not allowed to infringe on that right, in that way. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:25 am by MBettman
Williams, 129 Ohio St.3d 344 (2011) (Following the enactment of S.B. 10 all doubt has been removed: the classification, registration, and community-notification provisions in R.C. 2950 are punitive.) [read post]