Search for: "In re S.B." Results 161 - 180 of 309
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Aug 2015, 2:11 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Dallas Court of Appeals addresses complex issues in appeal from summary judgment in suit by tort clients who sued their lawyers for barratry     CARL "STACEY" NEESE, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF L.N., C.N., L.N., AND C.N., JAMES NEESE, DAVID NEESE, JENNIFER HUGHES, MITZI RENFROE, AND IRL HOOPER, Appellants, v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:45 pm
  We’re not thrilled that the legislature has exempted school districts from the bill’s requirements. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:18 am
That could change soon: we're closely watching state-level legislation such as S.B. 573 that would create statewide rules for open data, including the creation of a formal Chief Data Officer position that would write formal open data guidelines in consultation with the attorney general. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 7:07 am by Cathy Moran
But if you’re retired, disabled, or out of work, buying a new home may be out of the question. [read post]
27 May 2015, 9:48 am
Owens, 274 S.E.2d 484, 485–86 (Ga. 1981); S.B. v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 3:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
The Court’s opinion in In re Cornerstone Therapeutics, Inc. can be found here. [read post]
12 May 2015, 6:00 am by Michelle O'Neil
See In re D.S. at http://caselaw.findlaw.com/ca-court-of-appeal/1606532.html. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:52 pm by Tracy Coenen
What can you do if you’re in favor of keeping the strong anti-SLAPP law in Nevada? [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 10:44 am by Dave Maass
In anticipation of that deadline, the General Assembly passed H.B. 2125 and S.B. 1301. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 11:57 am by jason
However, we’re writing today to explain why we’re strongly opposed to S.B. 192, a disastrous bill which would mandate the use of bicycle helmets for adults, and also require the use of reflective clothing at night. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:24 am by MBettman
This classification scheme, mandated under S.B. 10, constitutes cruel and unusual punishment, prohibited by the Eighth Amendment and by Article I, Section 9 of the Ohio Constitution. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 6:49 am by MBettman
Third, some offenders that are punished with mandatory registration under S.B. 10 fall into the same class as juveniles under In re C.P. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 12:31 am by Jason C. Gavejian
That legislation, S.B. 413, was unanimously passed by the Indiana Senate on February 24, 2015. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 4:37 am by Kevin LaCroix
Act to Amend Title 8 of the Delaware Code Relating to the General Corporation Law, S.B. 236, 147th Gen. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:45 am by WIMS
Petitioners challenge the Memorandum re: the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule on procedural and substantive grounds. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:30 am by By Alessandra Soler, ACLU of Arizona
The governor must re-examine her support for Senate Bill 1070, which is nothing more than state-sanctioned discrimination. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 3:10 pm by Immigration Prof
Jan Brewer of Arizona, a Republican whose approval of controversial immigration measures such as the ill-fated S.B. 1070 repeatedly put her in the national spotlight, announced that she would not run for re-election,... [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 8:10 am by Walter Olson
” McAffrey’s S.B. 1872 would also attach a new $5 processing fee to the tickets, of which a portion would be shared with the ticketing officer’s department. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 10:09 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) That’s what this proposed South Carolina bill (S.B. 878) (sponsored by Sen. [read post]