Search for: "In re STATE QUESTION NO. 236 v. WILLIAMSON" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Beck, et al.
  It's not a state law claim - the Supreme Court has never applied a "fraud on the market" presumption to state law even in securities cases.The presumption arose because the Supreme Court bought a questionable proposition – that securities markets are “efficient” and "developed. [read post]
Some have argued that, because the Nation’s approach to climate change is politically contested,[1] and since these matters affect major policy questions over which Congress has not granted the SEC new, explicit powers, the Commission lacks authority to require disclosure in this area.[2] For the reasons given below, the Commission should disregard these claims, focusing instead on the challenging policy choices that any finalization of the proposal would require. [read post]