Search for: "In re Samantha C." Results 61 - 73 of 73
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am by Badrinath Srinivasan
Finally, it also shows that tribunals may pierce the corporate veil of foreign investors in the context of counterclaims.Managing Disputes Through Contract: Evidence from M&A John C. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 6:36 am by Mandelman
  Because they’re banks, that’s why… and these days, banks and fraud are like bees and honey, don’t you know. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 7:05 am by Josh Wright
Mazzeo, Associate Professor, Kellogg School of Management, Northwestern University - Jonathan Hillel, J.D., Northwestern University School of Law (2009) - Samantha Zyontz, Senior Research Associate, Searle Civil Justice Institute, George Mason University School of Law Willful Patent Infringement and Enhanced Damages after In Re Seagate: An Empirical Study - Christopher B. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
(The Product Naming Blog)   US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions District Court C D California: Federal registration owned by someone else no defense to cybersquatting: Monex Deposit Co. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2009, 10:43 pm
Samantha finishes first and Endora second in all of these scenarios: (a) neither 'dog wins; (b) they both pick the same 'dog; (c) they pick different 'dogs and only Samantha's 'dog wins; or (d) Samantha takes Baltimore, Endora takes Arizona, and both 'dogs win. [read post]