Search for: "In re Scroggin" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2009, 9:40 am
See Matt Scroggins,Ex-Gen Re exec gets probation for finite fraud; Dave Collins, Houston Chronicle... [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 9:41 am
In fact, they’re soldiers (albeit perhaps drafted). [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 4:50 am
" 175 F.3d 345, 346 (5th Cir. 1999) (emphasis added); Scroggins, 599 F.3d at 450 (quoting the holding in Roque-Villanueva). [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:35 am by Tom Smith
 "We're all in agreement that the cultural war is over when it comes to homosexuality, especially when it comes to gay marriage. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:42 am by Bexis
  In a particularly notable footnote, the court criticized the opinion in Scroggin v. [read post]
30 May 2010, 8:36 pm
Why is somebody like Leonard Scroggins out on parole? [read post]
9 May 2008, 4:07 am
"  In the case of In re: PREMPRO PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION, DONNA SCROGGIN  v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by Steve McConnell
They're horrible and mean us harm, but they are also, luckily, make-believe. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 6:44 pm by Jack Bogdanski
We're going to create the place where people want to come back and have their businesses, so maybe they'll come back, because we'd like them back. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm by Lyle Denniston
Scroggin (09-1123) was a rare attempt to get the Court to clarify the meaning of the civil trial jury right protected by the Constitution’s Seventh Amendment. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 2:44 am
This clear reasoning can be contrasted with the inexplicable finding of the 8th Circuit in Scroggin v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 7:20 am
While we almost always have questions relating to the plaintiff's treatment, usually what we're even more interested in is what the prescriber thinks of the drug itself.Was s/he already aware of the claimed risk? [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 9:49 pm by Erin Miller
Scroggin Docket: 09-1123 Issues: (1) Whether a partial retrial limited to punitive damages violates the Seventh Amendment; and (2) whether a trial court can admit the testimony of a scientific expert without expressly addressing the applicability of the factors set out in Daubert v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 10:36 pm
We've debunked what we consider a spurious argument HIPAA (the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) interferes with state law on this subject, since that statute specifically excludes civil litigation from its purview.But we know, because we're involved in litigation all over the country, that not every (probably not even most) state agrees with us. [read post]