Search for: "In re Steve" Results 1 - 20 of 6,316
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2011, 5:03 pm by Glenn Reynolds
THE PROBLEM WITH STEVE JOBS’ CAREER ADVICE: You’re not Steve Jobs. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:18 pm by Greg Siskind
- Elise Foley: "Steve King got all Steve King-y at an immigration subcommittee hearing when he asked a witness, a law enforcement expert, for information on how he immigrated to the United States. 'You said you're likely the only immigrant on the panel,' King said. 'I wonder if you could tell us how was it you were inspired to come to the United States.' Arturo Venegas, a former Sacramento police chief, responded by telling King his U.S. [read post]
22 May 2009, 4:00 am
Steve asks: "Again, putting the legal issues aside, why doesn't the team do the right thing, as a responsible business, and hire a branding guru to engage in some serious and successful re-branding? [read post]
7 Jun 2008, 12:50 am
Steve Jobs is busy re-inventing the future (it will have touch screens and will only work with AT&T) and doesn't have time for you and your piddly little lawsuits or your tedious depositions â€â [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 9:21 am by immigrationprof
Steve King, a conservative firebrand congressman whom he endorsed for re-election last... [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 8:34 am by Stefan J. Padfield
Following a hiatus of almost 2 years, Steve Bradford, Josh Fershee, Anne Tucker, and I are pleased to announce the grand re-opening of the BLPB. [read post]
Steve Jobs is again taking a medical leave from Apple, the giant company he's built. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 8:05 pm
In the recent piece World’s richest not so rich, Gates regains top spot Chief Executive of Forbes Magazines Steve Forbes is quoted as saying: “Billionaires don’t have to worry about their next meal, but if their wealth is declining and you’re not creating numerous new billionaires, it means the rest of the world is not doing [...] [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 6:13 pm by Benjamin Wittes
We’re excited about that–and excited, more generally, to have him aboard. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 10:06 am
He even said that Steve and Bruce were perhaps planning to assist in restoring public trust in the US Attorney's office, and of course everyone in Steve's orbit shared his passion for politics and for a change in the direction of the country. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 8:53 am by Goldberg Jones
What They’re Saying About Steve O’Hagan Talking about Steve, managing attorney Colin Amos says, “Steve’s experience as a prosecutor helps make him a sharp negotiator who is exceptionally comfortable in the courtroom. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 8:00 am by Alexis
  Ask the Expert with Steve Sleeper · Attorney Alexis Austin Ask the Expert with Steve Sleeper – Featuring Alex Austin Welcome to Ask the Expert with noted radio host Steve sleeper. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 12:00 pm by David M. Ward
How to write interesting emails that bring in clients You’re more interesting than Steve Jobs Related posts:Steve Jobs’ prescription for success and happiness–in his own words Steve Jobs’ resignation: what it means for your law practice The key trait Steve Jobs had that most lawyers don’t Steve Jobs’ greatest marketing lesson for lawyers 3 ways to turn boring legal topics into interesting articles and posts [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 12:49 pm by royblack
Analyze and re-analyze your presentation as you go. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 5:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
So we're going to do away with the title secretary and we're going to make up another bulls--- title called Area Associate. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 11:12 pm by Jeffrey Richardson
RIP Steve Jobs IDWJustin:  RT if you're touching an Apple product. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:12 pm by Mia Valenzuela
“We’re the type of attorneys that go to the mat on important issues, coming together and getting the job done. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 7:56 am by Benjamin Wittes
 For the reasons we state in the paper, we agree that Steve and Jen’s approach is feasible, we think it’s more problematic than ours. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 1:16 am by Matthew Hersh (Wolters Kluwer)
The court, wading into the increasingly heated debate over the boundary between trademark law principles and free speech rights, found that the government had no substantial interest in protecting a public official like the former President from having his name used without his consent (In re Steve Elster, February 24, 2022, Dyk, T.). [read post]