Search for: "In re Supreme Court Committee on Child Support" Results 21 - 40 of 182
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2018, 4:33 am by Adam
In re Report of the Family Law Steering Committee, 794 So. 2d 518, 522 (Fla. 2001). 10. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 12:24 am
Full post: Marilyn Stowe Blog.Case Comment: Re B (a child) [2013] UKSC 33Tessa Buchanan comments upon the Supreme Court case of Re B (A Child). [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 2:38 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
State (Indian Child Welfare Act – Termination of Parental Rights) In re A.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 4:00 am by Gritsforbreakfast
I am interested and I think all the individuals all my committee, if you look at the legislation they focus on, we're interested in a vibrant economy. [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 8:40 am by Eugene Volokh
An interesting Arizona Supreme Court Judicial Ethics Advisory Committee opinion.From Opinion 18-03, released in June, but just posted on Westlaw in the last day or so: ISSUES An Arizona court has established a working group to explore the extent to which the needs and concerns of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning (LGBTQ) youth are being addressed in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 12:16 am by Daniel Richardson
By David RangavizIn re K.F., 2013 VT 39Family law cases are almost invariably heartwrenching. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 2:11 pm by familoo
We have seen the Northern Irish Supreme Court Justice Lord Kerr suggesting that Article 3 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child ought to be directly applicable, and the Supreme Court applying it in Mathieson v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 47 (8 July 2015). [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 3:02 am by Conor Monighan
On the UKHRB Michael Spencer has written an article about KV (Sri Lanka) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, in which the Supreme Court gave guidance on the use of medical evidence in asylum cases. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 6:36 am
"  Responding to the Claiborne case, here are some highlights of a piece which rightly wonders why Senators filed a brief in support of the government: Two years ago, the Supreme Court ruled that federal guidelines could be only advisory, not mandatory. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 8:16 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The members of the ethics committee independently came to the conclusion that the mother's decision was an ethical one, since it was based upon her feeling for the child and her concern for the well-being of her child. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 10:30 am
Supreme Court has limited the application of this life and death sentence to children, around 2,500 people are currently serving this sentence for crimes they were involved in years ago as children. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
If a party wanted the court to adopt the exception, it appears that an argument similar to the one adopted in the California Court of Appeals case, In re Santos Y.[22] could be used.  [read post]