Search for: "In re Supreme Court Committee on Child Support" Results 61 - 80 of 174
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2016, 3:52 am by Ken Chasse
An equally important reason for creating a much more sophisticated and competent legal research facility for the legal profession, is the need of the courts, particularly the Supreme Court of Canada and the provincial and territorial Courts of Appeal. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:35 pm by Michael Ginsborg
Pete Stark, D-Calif., re-introduced the “Every Child Deserves a Family Act,” H.R. 4806 (previous bill, H.R. 3827). [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:45 am
Full report: Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 2:19 am by INFORRM
He is the third Blackpool supporter to be sued by the family. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:59 am by Jeremy Morley
The American view is usually you bear your own fees and costs.”Parties also rush to court to gain advantages in child custody and support matters. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am by Administrator
When the Supreme Court upheld the Indian Act’s discriminatory provisions on Indian status for women, Sandra Lovelace took her case before the UN Human Rights Committee, whi [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 8:59 am by PaulKostro
Kostro, Esq.: If you are interested in Mediation; or have issues relating to Divorce, Domestic Violence, Child Support; Landlord-Tenant Matters; Contracts; Business Formation or Disputes; or Other Legal Matters, please call me to schedule an appointment — I can be reached by telephone at (908)232-6500; or by Email. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Part II will assess how the court marshals the Supreme Court’s precedents concerning reviewability of immigration decisions and the Establishment Clause. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 3:12 am
The New Hampshire Supreme Court in In re Estate of Sharek, 930 A.2d 388 (N.H. 2007), also applied a revocation statute in an analogous situation. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 8:35 am by PaulKostro
Under N.J.S.A. 14A:3-6.5(5)(c), enacted after the Supreme Court’s PSE&G decision, see L. 2013, c. 42, the Legislature conditioned such pre-motion discovery. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Canada  The Supreme Court of Canada will not hear an appeal filed by political commentator Ezra Levant over a 2014 libel judgment against him. [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
Upon review, the Tenth Circuit affirmed the district court's determination that HHS was required to contract with the Tribe and regarding the contract start date, but reversed the court's decision regarding contract support costs. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 10:01 am by Jan von Hein
The father, however, objected and was of the opinion, supported by a decision of the Court of Appeal of Karlsruhe of 14 August 2008, that a child is only returned if it had established habitual residence in the state of origin. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 3:05 pm by LundgrenJohnson
An Out of Court Article on Hearsay An out of court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted. [read post]
9 Dec 2012, 12:04 pm by PaulKostro
Most recently, the Supreme Court in In re Kollman, 210 N.J. 557, 573 (2012), had occasion to interpret the “early pathways” amendment to the expungement statute. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:03 pm
Levesque, No. 081344 A forfeiture order for $3,068,000 for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute 100 kilograms or more of marijuana, is vacated and remanded where: 1) 21 U.S.C. section 853 authorizes money judgments; 2) the case is remanded to give district court the opportunity to consider whether and to what extent the ruling in the recent Supreme Court case, US v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am by Mary Dwyer
Federal Election Commission12-683Issue: When appellant wishes to take funds that may be legally contributed to political action committees and party committees, and instead contribute those same funds directly to additional candidate committees, whether the three-judge district court erred in dismissing her facial and as-applied challenge to Section 307(b) of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. [read post]