Search for: "In re Supreme Court Committee on Child Support"
Results 161 - 180
of 302
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2016, 11:12 am
Supreme Court decisions bar courts from jailing people simply because they are too poor to pay their fines. [read post]
1 Feb 2016, 3:52 am
An equally important reason for creating a much more sophisticated and competent legal research facility for the legal profession, is the need of the courts, particularly the Supreme Court of Canada and the provincial and territorial Courts of Appeal. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 1:51 pm
If you're worried about the world being on fire, you're worried about how we're going to use our military, you're worried about strengthening our military and you're worried most of all about keeping your homes and your families safe and secure, you cannot give Hillary Clinton a third term of Barack Obama's leadership. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 1:33 pm
The Supreme Court in Pascale v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:34 pm
Baker, County Court Judge, dismissed the indictment with leave to re-present. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 10:30 am
Supreme Court has limited the application of this life and death sentence to children, around 2,500 people are currently serving this sentence for crimes they were involved in years ago as children. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 8:47 am
Kozlowski, 80 N.J. 378(1979); In re: Estate of Roccamonte, 174 N.J. 381 (2002); Devaney v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
To do this, however, courts have had to ignore both Supreme Court precedent and the clear language of Rule 702. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm
A: Book does discuss unanimity: the ways in which it’s been interpreted; within the standing committees, the chair interprets whether or not there is unanimity. [read post]
11 Jul 2015, 8:16 pm
The members of the ethics committee independently came to the conclusion that the mother's decision was an ethical one, since it was based upon her feeling for the child and her concern for the well-being of her child. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:29 pm
Kona in support of Kona. [read post]
27 May 2015, 11:00 pm
We also know from the Supreme Court decision in R (SG) v Secretary of State [2015] UKSC 16 that the cap breaches the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child for cutting support to children for reasons which are unrelated to the needs of that child. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 5:07 am
Don't file Supreme Court briefs that lose 9-0. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 2:19 am
He is the third Blackpool supporter to be sued by the family. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:06 pm
This is the final post in a four-part series on the written arguments that have been filed in the same-sex marriage cases at the Supreme Court. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 7:22 am
That’s not possible in the Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 10:01 am
The father, however, objected and was of the opinion, supported by a decision of the Court of Appeal of Karlsruhe of 14 August 2008, that a child is only returned if it had established habitual residence in the state of origin. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 10:35 am
Springfield lawyer Howard Feldman, appointed to the committee by the Illinois Supreme Court, said that assigning responsibility that way avoids creating winners and losers in a process that often leads to conflict. [read post]
19 Jan 2015, 9:11 am
Rogers, which deals with the right to counsel in cases against parents who are hailed into to court in civil contempt cases for failure to pay child support. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:06 am
But this is a room that could be reasonably used by anyone under Reg B13 (5): a. a couple (within the meaning of Part 7 of the Act); b. a person who is not a child; ba. a child who cannot share a bedroom; c. two children of the same sex; d. two children who are less than 10 years old; e. a child. [read post]
