Search for: "In re Tahl"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2021, 1:02 am
The California Supreme Court decided in 1969, in the case of In re Tahl that a defendant must “knowingly and voluntarily” waive several of their rights in order for a plea of guilty or no-contest to remain valid. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 11:31 am
Acknowledging that Boykin could be interpreted as either requiring that a voluntary and intelligent waiver be fairly discernible from the record or that a strict ritual was required in every case, Justice Stanley Mosk's opinion for the court went with the ritual in In re Tahl (1970). [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
Alabama (1969) 395 U.S. 238 and In re Tahl (1969) 1 Cal.3d 122. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 6:52 pm
I re-read the Law.com article and have decided to take the challenge she has set forth. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:36 pm
takdirde TAHL? [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 1:02 pm
ilse, TAHL? [read post]
29 May 2017, 10:28 am
And even if you do, you’re not going to get professional advice for free. [read post]
