Search for: "In the Interest of LaRue"
Results 1 - 20
of 65
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2007, 1:44 pm
Interesting argument, and interesting lines of questions from the court, although I am skeptical as to how much guidance as to the court’s thinking one can draw from the Justice’s questions themselves. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 11:58 am
I thought I would pass along today this article from Business Insurance in which I am interviewed about LaRue, and its impact on plan sponsors. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 6:40 am
Either way, here’s an interesting article available on Lawyers USA today on the LaRue decision, and on the broader topic of what impact it will have. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 7:17 am
Anyone interested in the insurance implications of LaRue should find it a useful and informative post. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 7:09 am
I know from readers of this blog and from talking to other lawyers that people are very interested in LaRue and the Supreme Court’s current interest in ERISA cases - in fact, one lawyer told me that right after LaRue was decided he was at a meeting on an entirely different topic but LaRue is all anyone wanted to talk about that day- so I wanted to pass along this very interesting looking teleconference next month on individual 401(k)… [read post]
5 Jun 2021, 3:58 am
Larus’ interest in China. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 10:17 am
The competing opinions present some interesting issues. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 8:22 am
One interesting thing about the LaRue case is the amount of blog commentary it inspired. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 8:46 am
Can’t do LaRue all the time, every post, although, frankly, the more one thinks about the Supreme Court’s three opinions, the more one can come up with to talk about. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 8:44 am
, but this column on the decision in the April 2008 issue of Metropolitan Corporate Counsel magazine by two Proskauer attorneys is interesting. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 9:12 am
I do make an exception once and awhile, but only to the extent of passing along a particular ruling, without commentary, that may be of broader relevance and interest. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 12:00 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided LaRue v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 6:02 am
Tom Gies: An interesting question. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 8:38 am
Particularly interesting to me is the case of LaRue... [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 2:40 pm
If you're really interested, links to the briefs of the parties can be found here. [read post]
18 Jan 2008, 2:43 pm
Move over LaRue, the Supreme Court today granted a second ERISA case this term - this one involving structural conflicts of interest in denial of benefit claim cases under Section 502(a)(1)(B). [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 10:46 am
Employment ERISA; class certification Where class certification would include class members with conflicting interests, certification must be vacated. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 8:54 am
On the first point, I have noted that the famous - to a small group of interested observers otherwise known as ERISA lawyers and scholars - role played in LaRue by the so-called (by me, anyway) diamond hypothetical may have a wide range of implications for the development of the law, not all of them either intended or even foreseeable. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:26 am
In LaRue, the damages were claimed as decreased monetary value as a result of the actions of the administrator. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 6:21 am
But as I thought about it more, it struck me that, after LaRue (which is still the hot topic in benefits' circles), someone might be interested in 401(k) fees.The Employee Benefits Security Administration has a site called "A Look at 401(k) Fees. [read post]
