Search for: "In the Interest of LaRue"
Results 21 - 40
of 62
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
An interesting argument could be made for each style. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 8:47 am
Cases with the most footnotes: Heller 5-4 Scalia 29 64 0.45 Exxon 8-0 Souter 28 42 0.67 Danforth 7-2 Stevens 24 27 0.89 New Jersey 6-2 Ginsburg 22 23 0.96 Crawford 6-3 Stevens 21 21 1.00 Dept. of Rev. 7-2 Souter 21 28 0.75 Rothgery 8-1 Souter 17 20 0.85 Kimbrough 7-2 Ginsburg 15 23 0.65 Medellin 6-3 Roberts 14 37 0.38 Meacham 8-0 Souter 14 17 0.82 These represent an interesting cross section of the Court’s cases. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 3:40 pm
Third, here’s an interesting webinar rounding up the Supreme Court’s treatment of ERISA issues during the 2008 term. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 9:39 pm
Of more interest, perhaps, is the wide ranging group of consequences, some predictable and others unintended, that the Ninth Circuit ruling likely unleashes. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 4:31 pm
If you have an interest in both ERISA and in well written, logical judicial opinions, I can’t recommend highly enough this opinion, by Judge Gertner of the United States District Court for Massachusetts, in Bendaoud v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 5:04 pm
The list below presents the author's own compilation — in no particular order – of the most interesting and important petitions the Justices declined to grant during the previous term. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 9:08 pm
401(K) Party May Sue for Fiduciary Breach Under ERISA is a well written April 7, 2008 New York Law Journal article by Jeffrey S. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 9:23 am
(See LaRue v. [read post]
2 Apr 2008, 8:44 am
, but this column on the decision in the April 2008 issue of Metropolitan Corporate Counsel magazine by two Proskauer attorneys is interesting. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 7:09 am
I know from readers of this blog and from talking to other lawyers that people are very interested in LaRue and the Supreme Court’s current interest in ERISA cases - in fact, one lawyer told me that right after LaRue was decided he was at a meeting on an entirely different topic but LaRue is all anyone wanted to talk about that day- so I wanted to pass along this very interesting looking teleconference next month on individual 401(k)… [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 8:22 am
One interesting thing about the LaRue case is the amount of blog commentary it inspired. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 7:53 am
The case is LaRue v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 6:40 am
Either way, here’s an interesting article available on Lawyers USA today on the LaRue decision, and on the broader topic of what impact it will have. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 6:21 am
But as I thought about it more, it struck me that, after LaRue (which is still the hot topic in benefits' circles), someone might be interested in 401(k) fees.The Employee Benefits Security Administration has a site called "A Look at 401(k) Fees. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:26 am
In LaRue, the damages were claimed as decreased monetary value as a result of the actions of the administrator. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 11:58 am
I thought I would pass along today this article from Business Insurance in which I am interviewed about LaRue, and its impact on plan sponsors. [read post]
28 Feb 2008, 7:48 am
First up was LaRue v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 8:46 am
Can’t do LaRue all the time, every post, although, frankly, the more one thinks about the Supreme Court’s three opinions, the more one can come up with to talk about. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 1:46 pm
Just yesterday, the Court issued its ruling and, in so doing, endorsed the approach taken by the Sixth Circuit in Tullis.In particular, the Court ruled in LaRue v. [read post]
25 Feb 2008, 7:17 am
Anyone interested in the insurance implications of LaRue should find it a useful and informative post. [read post]
