Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10"
Results 1 - 20
of 5,353
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2025, 12:30 pm
We hereby renounce our clear-statement rule, which conflicted with SCOTUS guidance and put us on the wrong side of a 12-1 circuit split. [read post]
13 Feb 2025, 10:52 am
Must comply with laws, rules, Community directives and office policies and procedures applicable to the performance of the job and must perform additional tasks as assigned by supervising personnel. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 4:52 pm
Let’s review: (1) The CFPB’s Legal Authorities Remain Unaffected. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 9:03 am
This volume picks up where the last one left off in July 2024, but also includes a slightly older case that was not on my radar last time around.1. [read post]
9 Feb 2025, 9:01 pm
Decision and Order, In the Matter of EnCap Invs., L.P., et al., No. [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 3:00 am
Circuit Court of Appeals had reversed Fortenberry’s conviction, ruling the case should not have been tried in Los Angeles. [read post]
6 Feb 2025, 4:52 pm
The Council therefore considers that uncertainty still attaches to how the situation will develop going forward. iiContents 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Matters considered by the Council ............................................................... 2 1.2 Human rights standards ................................................................................ 3 1.3 Sources… [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 3:58 pm
Therefore such “birthright” citizenship is established as a matter of statute, regardless of how a President today might read the Fourteenth Amendment—and Executive Branch officials may not act in contravention of that statute. [read post]
2 Feb 2025, 4:23 pm
136 of 10 December 2013, converted with amendments into Law no. [read post]
1 Feb 2025, 6:16 pm
(NEA), section 604 of the Trade Act of 1974, as amended (19 U.S.C. 2483), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I, DONALD J. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Reviewing New Jersey's venue rules, the Court concluded that "plaintiffs cannot commence an action in New Jersey because the cause of action arose outside its borders" (id. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
Reviewing New Jersey's venue rules, the Court concluded that "plaintiffs cannot commence an action in New Jersey because the cause of action arose outside its borders" (id. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 1:02 am
Recent decisions applying the new rules An analysis of eleven cases decided by the BRPTO’s Board of Appeals reveals valuable insights on the implementation of the new rules in regard to (1) reevaluation of prior-art references; (2) reexamination of claims and arguments; and (3) case outcomes. [read post]
24 Jan 2025, 12:30 pm
Friends, Short Circuit is turning 10, and we're having a party! [read post]
24 Jan 2025, 11:16 am
The effective date for the amendments is January 1, 2025. [read post]
24 Jan 2025, 9:59 am
Trump #1 Arroyo v. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 6:31 am
Section 34(2) of the Senior Courts Act 1981 provides that “On the application, in accordance with rules of court, of a party to any proceedings, the High Court shall, in such circumstances as may be specified in the rules, have power to order a person who is not a party to the proceedings and who appears to the court to be likely to have in his possession, custody or power any documents which are relevant to an issue arising out of the said claim— (a) to… [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 2:23 pm
These reflections do not focus on the "merits" of the proclamation, nor does it consider the contemporary development of the rules around and the extent of presidential authority either generally or in this context. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
The reports were for the period from October 1, 2023 through September 30, 2024. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 6:30 am
Olson,[10] a 7-1 decision upholding the constitutionality of the Independent Counsel Act, with a powerful, sole dissent from Justice Antonin Scalia, a formalist much like Justice Black had been.[11] But, unlike Justice Black, Justice Scalia put forward for the first time a robust defense of executive departmentalism grounded in the idea that the Constitution vested the presidency with complete control over the exercise of executive power. [read post]