Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10"
Results 261 - 280
of 5,904
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2017, 7:45 am
at *1. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
Thus, the [applicant] was entitled to file on its motion matter that it considered to be missing.[7] The references to “missing” drawings appearing in each of paragraphs (1) to (3) of R 56 must be interpreted consistently with each other to give a meaningful effect to the rule as a whole (see also J 27/10 [10]). [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 3:29 pm
Introduction FINRA Rule 6490 was approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 1, 2010, with the stated purposes of adopting rules to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, promote just and equitable principles of trade and protect investors and the public interest. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm
Accordingly, the Court’s cases applying the Bill of Rights to the states rely on a different provision of Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment, its Due Process Clause.Justice Thomas disagrees with that approach. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
Indeed, there are key differences between the ISP and social media markets that matter for the First Amendment analysis. [read post]
31 Jan 2009, 9:50 am
Id. at *10. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 4:55 pm
Amend. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 1:34 pm
As recognized by states such as Ohio (comment 3 to Rule 1.6) and Idaho (comment 3 to Rule 1.6), this applies to any information relating to the representation, regardless of its source.It is worth noting that a recent ruling from the Virginia Supreme Court suggests that First Amendment protections may outweigh an attorney’s duty to withhold non-confidential client information in the context of blogging about closed cases that are already a… [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 8:33 am
I will provide links to reports and analysis on court and other legal matters on Wechat. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 8:16 pm
Aug. 10, 2022) (applying recapture to amendments to overcome eligibility rejections). [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:56 pm
Moreover, the amendment should have been permitted under Rule 28(1) of the Uniform Rules of Court, which allow parties to amend their pleadings unless good cause is shown to the contrary. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 11:57 am
Apr. 10, 2014)The court adopted the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny Kind leave to amend its counterclaims to add a Lanham Act false advertising claim. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 2:22 pm
June 20, 2024) ruled unlawful and invalidated the portion of this rule that provides that HIPAA obligations are triggered in “circumstances where an online technology connects (1) an individual’s IP address with (2) a visit to a[n] [unauthenticated public webpage] addressing specific health conditions or healthcare providers. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 6:01 am
(“LBHI”) filed two new motions in its ongoing Southern District of New York Bankruptcy Court litigation against approximately 130 loan originators and brokers: (1) an Omnibus Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaints Pursuant to Rule 7015 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (“Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint”); and (2) a Motion for Leave to Amend and Extend the Scope of the Alternative Dispute… [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 9:14 am
Yes, the Rule does not require disclosure of the following types of agreements and arrangements: 1. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:43 pm
It is expected that consideration of rules revisions will be an early matter for consideration when Senators reconvene. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 9:36 am
Below is the request for rulemaking to eliminate the "evergreen" requirement in amended Rule 144(i). [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 1:53 pm
., decided 10/2/2009) In what may be the Fourth Department's first decision addressing what constitutes a plaintiff's prima facie showing in a no-fault action, the appellate court ruled that plaintiff MRI facility made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence that the prescribed statutory billing forms were received by defendant and that defendant's payment of no-fault benefits to plaintiff was… [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 8:01 am
While the amendment technically eliminated the provision requiring companies to contractually ensure third party compliance, nevertheless contractual requirements, including new reps and warrantees, will as a matter of sound practice be needed by January 1, 2010. [read post]
4 May 2007, 5:14 am
Evans, 514 U.S. 1, 12-14 (1995), the Supreme Court noted that the exclusionary rule does not apply to every violation of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
