Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10" Results 21 - 40 of 5,409
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2017, 6:52 am by Romano Beitsma
Rule 80 EPCThe appellant argues that the requirements of Rule 80 EPC are not met, because it is not apparent which ground for opposition has occasioned the amendments contained in the main request.The board disagrees.Claims 1 and 6 have been restricted in order to exclude embodiments in which the motor [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 5:00 am by Bexis
Pa. 2005), for a cautionary tale.Anyway, after 12/1/10, a lot of this (although probably not all) should be a thing of the past. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 7:46 am by emagraken
Rule 6-1 deals with amendments to BC Supreme Court pleadings. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 5:29 am by Schachtman
Co., No. 1:08–0909, 2010 WL 692842, at *1 (S.D.W.Va. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 10:34 am by John L. Culhane, Jr.
” The district court concluded that the Maine amendments were preempted under the FCRA’s express preemption provision (15 U.S.C. 1681t(b)(1)(E)) which preempts state law “with respect to any subject matter regulated under…[15 U.S.C. 1681c], relating to information contained in consumer reports. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 2:27 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
On October 10-12, 2011, the Council of Europe’s Bureau of the Consultative Committee of the Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to the Automatic Processing of Personal Data (known as the “T-PD-Bureau”) met in Strasbourg, France, to discuss, among other things, amending the Council of Europe’s Convention 108 and Additional Protocol. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 8:00 pm
" Other Rules Similar amendments were made to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 11:22 am by PaulKostro
., C-42-10, MERCER COUNTY, June 8, 2011: Rule 4:9-1 provides that leave to amend pleadings “shall be freely given in the interest of justice. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 6:01 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
To prevail in a public employee speech claim, the plaintiff must show (1) he spoke on a matter of public importance and (2) he spoke out as a citizen and not as an employee. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 6:38 am
 The amendment will apply to shareholder meetings held on or after January 1, 2010. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 2:22 pm by Dennis Crouch
 Defending that approach on appeal, the Agency has defiantly argued that its rules regarding amendments and its application of those rules are both reasonable and entitled to substantial deference from the Court of Appeals. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 11:12 am
  For example, instead of 10 claims, patent applications may have up to 25 claims (including 5 independent claims) as a matter of right. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 8:23 am
Ct., Kings Co., decided 10/14/2008)Since August 10, 2005, the "Graves Amendment" has provided vehicle lessors and renters with a statutory basis for dismissing vicarious liability claims in motor vehicle accident lawsuits. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 8:56 am by Jessica Kroeze
Rule 80 EPC stipulates that amendments to the claims of a granted patent may be made provided that these are occasioned by a ground for opposition. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 9:23 am
On June 10, 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, proposed a comprehensive series of rule amendments to facilitate the rights of shareholders to nominate a minority slate of directors on corporate boards.[1]There was speculation that final action could be taken on the proposed rule amendments—known as the direct access proposal—as early as November 2009 and that the changes would be effective for the 2010 proxy… [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 11:24 am by Eileen McDermott
Patent No. 8,572,111, amended claims 1-9 and 19-21 following an examiner’s rejection of them as patent ineligible, since they were not tied to a processor for conducting the claimed searches. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 11:24 am by Eileen McDermott
Patent No. 8,572,111, amended claims 1-9 and 19-21 following an examiner’s rejection of them as patent ineligible, since they were not tied to a processor for conducting the claimed searches. [read post]