Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10" Results 101 - 120 of 5,508
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2024, 2:50 am by INFORRM
DLA Piper’s Privacy Matters Blog has summarised three new draft cyber security bills published by the Australian Government this week. [read post]
11 Oct 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
From the States and Municipalities California – As the Legislature Reaches Towards Gender Parity, the Number of Female Lobbyists Is Also Growing Capitol Weekly – Brian Joseph | Published: 10/1/2024 There was a time when Sacramento’s female lobbyists were frozen out of meetings, literally not invited to important discussions about their clients’ bills simply because they were women. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 11:18 pm by Chris Castle
Plaintiff’s Cross-Motion to Amend: The plaintiff’s cross-motion to amend the complaint was denied. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Hobby Lobby Stores ruled that federal law could not require a business to offer health insurance that includes birth control against the religious objections of controlling shareholders. [read post]
7 Oct 2024, 10:20 am by Arthur F. Coon
The Coalition filed a writ of mandate action challenging the regulatory process, amended it twice to raise all of the CEQA and APA issues discussed in the appeal, and sought to augment the record with three documents. [read post]
6 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm by ngodridge
”[10] Reporting Deadlines As noted above, reporting obligations under the CTA took effect on January 1, 2024. [read post]
Starting January 1, employers are officially banned from holding captive audience meetings—mandatory employer-sponsored meetings that discuss religious or political matters—which are a common and accepted defense against union organizing. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 4:00 am by David Lynn
Establishing procedures for amending reports or filing late reports in a timely manner when it is determined that an error has occurred; and 10. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
He claimed the video was protected by the First Amendment because it was a parody. [read post]
3 Oct 2024, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
If you need more convincing, consider a president (clearly a state actor) who needs to fill a vice-presidential vacancy under the 25th Amendment. [read post]