Search for: "In the Matter of Amendments to Rules 1 and 10" Results 161 - 180 of 5,883
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2024, 10:30 pm by Alexandra Molitorisová
If a new regulation were to be adopted today, it would take an additional 10 to 15 years for the first real applications to appear on the market, e.g. in food products. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The Mystery Behind $10 Million of ‘Bridge Funding’ Supporting RFK Jr. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am by Phil Dixon
The district court failed to rule on these motions, and the jury ultimately entered a verdict in favor of the officer-defendant. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 4:29 pm by Unknown
 Only (1) finished products (2) subject to a CPSC rule must be tested and certified. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 5:55 am by Joseph Nunn
This language was left unchanged until 1956, when the statute’s second sentence was amended to its current phrasing as part of the recodification of Title 10. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:54 pm by Eugene Volokh
" At the start of the January 10, 2022 disciplinary hearing, Judge Moukawsher, stated: "As the record will reflect, the court denied the motion to disqualify Judge Adelman and made conclusions that Attorney Cunha had substantially misrepresented on matters of fact to the court. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 5:22 am by Eliav Lieblich
First, the manual explicitly rejects the application of the law of occupation to situations of “mere invasion,” while stating that only “as a matter of policy,” the armed forces would seek to apply rules from the law occupation to areas were U.S. forces are passing tor fighting (§11.1.3.1). [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
Part II of Donald Trump’s brief argues that the factual predicate for the Colorado Supreme Court’s decision to remove Trump’s name from the primary ballot was absent because Trump did not “engage in” an insurrection against the United States on January 6, 2021.[1]  [Apologies in advance about all the footnotes, but I didn't want to clutter the text with too many peripheral matters.]The Colorado Supreme Court held that Trump’s words… [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm by Josh Blackman
" Regardless of how the Court rules on Petitioner's case, the argument that Respondent advances about the Speaker and Senate President Pro Tempore must be rejected. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
If the court rules in Jarkesy’s favor on his Seventh Amendment claim, the SEC may be required to bring certain civil penalty actions for securities violations in federal court. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 2:06 am by David Pocklington
Earlier posts, here and here, have considered various aspects of “sufficient interest” in faculty proceedings under S10(1) and S10(2) Faculty Jurisdiction Rules 2015 (as amended) [1]. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
  Over-regulation of matters historically left to the discretion of directors restricts the flexibility and creative energy that directors bring to a board. [read post]