Search for: "In the Matter of J.P."
Results 1 - 20
of 541
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
Matter of Croghan v Adams2025 NY Slip Op 01285Decided on March 06, 2025Appellate Division, First DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: March 06, 2025Before: Kern, J.P., Mendez, Rodriguez, Pitt-Burke, Higgitt, JJ.Index No. 157449/22|Appeal No. 3823|Case No. 2024-00714|[*1]In the Matter… [read post]
21 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
Matter of Croghan v Adams2025 NY Slip Op 01285Decided on March 06, 2025Appellate Division, First DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: March 06, 2025Before: Kern, J.P., Mendez, Rodriguez, Pitt-Burke, Higgitt, JJ.Index No. 157449/22|Appeal No. 3823|Case No. 2024-00714|[*1]In the Matter… [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
Dept., 30 NY3d 67, 74-75 [2017]; Matter of Barry v O'Neill, 185 AD3d 503, 505 [1st Dept 2020]). [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
Dept., 30 NY3d 67, 74-75 [2017]; Matter of Barry v O'Neill, 185 AD3d 503, 505 [1st Dept 2020]). [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division's decision, indicating the Plaintiffs' arguments in the instant matter were "speculative and insufficient to trigger judicial intervention" dismissed th Plaintiffs' cause of action.The Appellate Division's decision is set out below: Wong v New York City Empls.' Retirement Sys.2025 NY Slip Op 01332Decided on March 11, 2025Appellate Division, First DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting… [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division's decision, indicating the Plaintiffs' arguments in the instant matter were "speculative and insufficient to trigger judicial intervention" dismissed th Plaintiffs' cause of action.The Appellate Division's decision is set out below: Wong v New York City Empls.' Retirement Sys.2025 NY Slip Op 01332Decided on March 11, 2025Appellate Division, First DepartmentPublished by New York State Law Reporting… [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 6:48 am
But prosecutors do want the judge to bar Siegal from cross-examining witnesses or making arguments relating to matters in which he was personally involved. [read post]
30 Jan 2025, 8:20 am
A dark chapter in the history of refusals by States Parties to comply with their obligations to cooperate with the International Criminal Court (ICC) was written last week by Italy. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:24 am
While Siegal at that point turned over some of Javice’s texts to Morgan investigators, prosecutors say they now know her messages contained significantly more responsive communications—including about the alleged fraud on J.P. [read post]
20 Jan 2025, 2:52 am
(UK) Ltd. v J.P. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
The J.P. [read post]
14 Jan 2025, 9:49 am
A Grievance Committee of the North Carolina State Bar reprimanded an attorney for a conflict of interest From about February 2021 to January 2022, you represented client J.P in a civil matter and an unrelated criminal charge. [read post]
31 Dec 2024, 2:03 pm
” and J.P. [read post]
30 Dec 2024, 3:00 am
In January, the SEC fined J.P. [read post]
19 Dec 2024, 9:05 pm
In 2020, J.P. [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 6:00 am
II, 20 NY3d at 282 [alternations omitted]; see Matter of Samadjopoulos v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 104 AD3d 551, 552). [read post]
6 Dec 2024, 6:00 am
II, 20 NY3d at 282 [alternations omitted]; see Matter of Samadjopoulos v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 104 AD3d 551, 552). [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 9:01 pm
J.P. [read post]
24 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm
The actions included an $18 million civil penalty against J.P. [read post]
21 Nov 2024, 6:00 am
Further, when an arbitration results from a procedure outlined in a collective bargaining agreement, only those who are parties to the collective bargaining agreement can seek to vacate the arbitrator's award, unless the collective bargaining agreement grants those rights to a third party (see Matter of Alava v Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y., 183 AD2d 713, 714 [2d Dept 1992]; see also Matter of City of Syracuse [Lee], 163 AD3d 1394, 1397 [4th Dept 2018]; see… [read post]
