Search for: "In the Matter of Pennington"
Results 1 - 20
of 194
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2017, 3:30 am
The Estate’s claim of sex discrimination, therefore, fails as a matter of law. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 1:49 pm
Beautyvice submitted a counter notice, but eBay told Beautyvice to resolve this matter directly with the rights owner. [read post]
8 Dec 2018, 12:00 am
The fight has begun on this matter. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 1:59 am
I was intrigued by the new study from the Pennington Research Center concluding that weight gain depends on calories, not how much protein you eat.The idea that the protein, fat, or carbohydrate content of your diet matters more to weight than how many calories you eat persists despite much evidence to the contrary.This study did something impressive. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 5:23 am
Pennington v. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 2:31 pm
“An attorney–client relationship was not created between Collins and Pennington simply because Collins discussed matters with Pennington that were relevant to both Pennington’s and Advantage’s interests,” the court said. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 3:21 am
Where basic theory matters most, studies should be designed in ways that stress internal validity. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 5:43 pm
The effect of these statutes is a matter of debate. [read post]
28 May 2014, 10:31 am
” Before the Georgia District Court on remand, the defendants argued that the FTC’s complaint should be dismissed as a matter of law because the settlement and approval process was legitimate petitioning for governmental action, and thus protected by the Noerr-Pennington doctrine. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 10:56 am
The argument is pretty interesting: the Michigan lower courts that have applied Noerr-Pennington to state law claims did so as a matter of First Amendment reasoning directly, rather than constitutional avoidance (the explicit ground on which Noerr-Pennington was decided). [read post]
27 Dec 2008, 10:57 pm
We lost two out of three last week and sit at 809 Penningtons. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 5:33 pm
As an initial matter, the District Court noted that the Noerr-Pennington doctrine provides immunity from antitrust liability to “[a] party who petitions the government for redress,” and that this immunity “extends to persons who petition all kinds of government entities, including legislatures, administrative agencies, and courts. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 1:00 am
Where I live in Pennington, NJ, we were mostly out of power for one week, but I have friends and neighbors who were getting by without power for much longer than that. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm
Confirmation of those details is a matter for families and their doctors. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 7:00 am
Whether you have a will or a living trust doesn't matter if the plan isn't tailored to meet your goals! [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 6:13 am
Acrimony - no matter how heated - is usually NOT sufficient to warrant removal of a PR [click here for recent example]. [read post]
12 Nov 2007, 6:13 am
Acrimony - no matter how heated - is usually NOT sufficient to warrant removal of a PR [click here for recent example]. [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 6:55 am
Economic loss to the subject matter of the contract does not give rise to tort liability. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 8:48 am
Most people who come into contact with NJ's courts are involved in municipal court matters. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 6:58 am
Nonetheless, because the Noerr-Pennington doctrine has an exception for sham petitions, and the Board failed to address whether the casino’s petition was a sham, the appeals court remanded the matter so that the Board may consider that question in the first instance (Venetian Casino Resort, L.L.C. v. [read post]
