Search for: "In the Matter of Pennington" Results 21 - 40 of 194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Nov 2021, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The Noerr-Pennington doctrine protects the right under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution to petition the government for governmental action, including through litigation and activity incidental to litigation” (Matter of People v Northern Leasing Sys., Inc., 193 AD3d 67, 77 [citation omitted]; see Alfred Weissman Real Estate v Big V Supermarkets, 268 AD2d 101, 106-107). [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:41 pm by Howard Ullman
Trade associations (and everyone else, for that matter) do enjoy an antitrust immunity for government petitioning under the so-called Noerr-Pennington doctrine, which is derived from the First Amendment. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 4:52 pm
A Kings Probate Attorney can help you with the legal matters concerning probate proceedings. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:07 am by SHG
Pennington argued that 64 months was enough. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
, Catholics and Capital Punishment: Do Pope Francis's Teachings Matter in Policy Preferences? [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 12:58 pm by NARF
Cherokee Nation (Statute of Limitations) Matter of H.J.M. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 9:50 am by Editors
However, there are dangers that come with working in a niche…” Read: The Dangers of Having a Niche at Pennington Hennessy Photo by jfgornet The post Danger for a Niche Lawyer appeared on InhouseBlog.com. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:15 am by CMS
It was found that none of the exceptions applied in this matter. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 11:33 pm
Morse and Felicia Kay Pennington, individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated v. [read post]
5 Jun 2009, 11:13 am
Pennington County uses Auto-Mark machines and tabulation software from Election Systems and Software. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 8:33 am by Buce
  Pennington is proving to be a bottomless well of good insights, but there is other stuff around the house also. [read post]
20 May 2010, 11:12 am by Pilar G. Kraman
Notably, Judge Robinson declined to accept defendant’s argument that she should find that the previous litigation was not a sham as a matter of law, due to the court’s previous finding that Noerr-Pennington barred a counterclaim in the previous litigation. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 6:19 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the matter of State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:26 pm
However, there is a well-established exception to the Noerr-Pennington doctrine for sham litigation. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 4:05 pm by Buce
They both have a bit of a lisp, but no matter: from the moment they open their mouths, you know you're in the hands of a total pro, in complete control of the material. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 7:04 am by WSLL
The Court finds one question to be dispositive and does not consider the other matters presented. [read post]