Search for: "In the Matter of the Grand Jury Subpoena Served on John Doe"
Results 1 - 20
of 100
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2018, 3:32 am
To what extent does a President have to respond to a subpoena request? [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:31 pm
The court goes on to explain how, and why, the issue arose:Company A, John Doe, his lawyer, and Doe's business associate are the subjects of an ongoing grand jury investigation into an allegedly fraudulent business scheme. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:00 pm
See, e.g., In re Grand Jury, John Doe No. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:15 pm
At least theoretically, the Fifth Amendment does not preclude a subject from appearing before a grand jury. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 5:39 am
In re Grand Jury Subpoena, supra. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 7:13 am
In re Grand Jury Matter #3, supra.The opinion goes on to explain thatCompany A, John Doe, his lawyer, and Doe's business associate are the subjects of an ongoing grand jury investigation into an allegedly fraudulent business scheme. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
§ 194, the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia has the “duty [] to bring the matter before the grand jury for its action. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 10:28 am
But the decision in that case does not mean that the financial records that the grand jury seeks will be turned over: The court sent the case back to the trial court and agreed that the president could still argue that complying with this subpoena would interfere with his ability to do his job. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
First, the Clause, as interpreted by the Supreme Court, does not provide sufficient legal basis to resist wholesale a subpoena to testify before the grand jury in the January 6th investigation. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:58 am
By that time, Iosbaker and Weiner had been served subpoenas to appear before a grand jury investigating “material support” for “foreign terrorist organizations. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am
Serving this sentence might make Bannon a martyr and a hero in the eyes of many MAGA boosters. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 11:56 am
But Republican legislators openly advocated for the impeachment of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Commissioner John Koskinen in 2016 because of the IRS’s responses to their subpoenas. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 4:35 am
The proceedings below The Vance case arises out of a subpoena issued by New York County (Manhattan) District Attorney Cyrus Vance to Mazars for financial records as part of an ongoing state grand-jury proceeding that, as the U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 12:23 pm
He would give Congress the information it needed to seek judicial assistance in obtaining any and all material relevant to his report that would otherwise be protected under grand-jury secrecy rules. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 10:23 am
Remember those reports about grand jury witnesses being asked about John Edwards' sex life? [read post]
10 May 2020, 9:01 pm
” The appeals court rejected this claim and “after reviewing historical and legal precedent,” concluded that “presidential immunity does not bar the enforcement of a state grand jury subpoena directing a third party to produce non-privileged material, even when the subject matter under investigation pertains to the President. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 7:14 am
Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance Jr. then began a grand jury investigation into the legality of payments made by the president and his businesses. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 5:30 am
But the story, and the lesson for Nadler, does not quite end there. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 7:22 pm
Here is John’s guest post. [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 5:00 am
… [C]ompelling one of the President’s immediate advisers to testify on a matter of executive decision-making would also raise serious constitutional problems, no matter what the assertion of congressional need. [read post]