Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of: M. M. B., Child." Results 1 - 20 of 138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2022, 5:57 am
M also has a young child with F3 who is referred to as F. [read post]
4 May 2009, 9:57 am
Our answer is that it matters, but not in terms of her welfare. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 6:14 pm by Gregory Forman
§ 63-17-20(B) (Unless the court orders otherwise, the custody of an illegitimate child is solely in the natural mother unless the mother has relinquished her rights to the child). [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am by Russell Knight
(b) Failure to maintain a reasonable degree of interest, concern or responsibility as to the child’s welfare. [read post]
29 Sep 2022, 10:02 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
A Systematic Literature Review of the Gap between a Right to Participate and Participation, in Welfare Services Policy and Practice NoteJulie A Tippens, Amleset Tewodros, Helen M Miamidian, Kara Kohel, & Alex Otieno, Church as NGO? [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:40 pm by familoo
It was said to b a compilation of the details of “29 children in 13 families who were killed…as a result of contact (and in one case residence) arrangements”. [read post]
6 Aug 2016, 1:37 pm by familoo
I must, as a matter of law and as set out above, weigh public policy concerns against the welfare of these particular children. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am by chief
As it is a question of fact, ultimately this must be a matter for the court. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am by chief
As it is a question of fact, ultimately this must be a matter for the court. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 8:49 am
I'm not going to give you advice about bailing your "fiance" out of jail in Moosylvania, no matter how sad the story. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am by Joel R. Brandes
April 16, 2019Appellate Division, Second Department Appellate Division holds that Indian Child Welfare Act applies to Neglect Proceeding and Shinnecock Tribe had right to intervene In Matter of Durpee M, v Samantha Q., 2019 WL 1461831 (2d Dept., 2019) the mother and her husband (father) were the parents of the child, who was born in January 2017. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 11:18 pm
Federal Magistrate Coker's decision was to reject the mother's application to return to Sydney with the child. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 8:16 am
However, a decision under Part VII on whether the child can reasonably be expected to reside with the parent is not made on the assumption that the parent will have accommodation available, but instead involves deciding whether such accommodation should be secured, which brings in wider considerations than the welfare of the child. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:24 pm by Lucy Reed
Other than matters relating to the mother, her physical health, her mental health and/or personality, there has been no valid reason to limit or curtail the relationship between M and her father, yet the court process has concluded, after more than ten years, with an order denying the father any direct contact with his daughter. [read post]