Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B. A. and J. H., Parents."
Results 1 - 20
of 34
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2021, 5:26 am
(b) Failure to maintain a reasonable degree of interest, concern or responsibility as to the child’s welfare. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
(b) Failure to maintain a reasonable degree of interest, concern or responsibility as to the child’s welfare. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 5:16 am
A.C. 5101:2-42-18 (Children’s Services’ approval of placements with substitute caregivers) (B)(2) (For any potential caregiver or adult in the household, a search of the statewide automated child welfare information system (SACWIS) must be completed per A.C. 5101:2-33-22.) [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 8:30 am
As the Supreme Court of California stated in In re Nicolas H. and again in Elisa B., what drives these presumptions is the state’s concern for the child’s welfare and its interest in preserving the integrity of the family. [read post]
18 May 2014, 12:33 pm
Income of the marital trusts was to be paid to H during her lifetime with discretion to the trustee to distribute principal to H for her health, support, maintenance, comfort and welfare. [read post]
23 May 2012, 12:00 pm
” H. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
H (1994) HCA 48. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
H (1994) HCA 48. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
(b) In all Indian child custody proceedings, as defined in the federal Indian Child Welfare Act, the court shall consider all of the findings contained in subdivision (a), strive to promote the stability and security of Indian tribes and families, comply with the federal Indian Child Welfare Act, and seek to protect the best interest of the child. [read post]
9 May 2007, 8:06 am
As before, custody matters are not to be decided by a jury. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
Circumstances of contemporary daily interactions between men and women, warrants that the “opportunity” element of proof of adultery must be interpreted to mean more that mere “proximity,” but must instead necessarily mean “proximity plus. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:15 am
I’m not going to set it all out here but the core part (from section 1) is this : (3) Behaviour is “abusive” if it consists of any of the following— (a) physical or sexual abuse; (b) violent or threatening behaviour; (c) controlling or coercive behaviour; (d) economic abuse (see subsection (4)); (e) psychological, emotional or other abuse; and it does not matter whether the behaviour consists of a single incident or a course of conduct. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:36 pm
In Kristine H. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 2:06 pm
Herbert B. [read post]
10 Aug 2021, 6:45 am
(b) The economic circumstances of the parties. [read post]
28 May 2012, 3:48 am
• There is no change to paragraph (b). [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 8:31 am
Fewer hearings, fewer fact findings hearings (notwithstanding Re H-N), fewer witnesses, shorter hearings. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 1:44 pm
Joint Checking AccountThe parties shall establish a joint checking account from which either party may withdraw funds for the payment of household and other joint living expenses, including living expenses of the child(ren). [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 8:46 am
(b) On January 27, 2017, to implement this policy, I issued Executive Order 13769 (Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States). [read post]
7 May 2010, 3:41 pm
However, fairly obviously there are two criteria:• Domestic• Violence[4] In general terms, domestic violence occurs in a relationship of a domestic nature, typically husband and wife or de facto partners, whereas family violence occurs in a broader family relationship, eg parent to child.[5] The mistake that is often made is to fail to recognise abuse that is not physical, which can clearly be identified as domestic violence.[6] A useful definition, as good as any out… [read post]
