Search for: "In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. S. F., Parent."
Results 1 - 20
of 49
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2021, 5:26 am
(g) Failure to protect the child from conditions within his environment injurious to the child’s welfare. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 3:40 pm
And so the matter came to hearing. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am
(g) Failure to protect the child from conditions within his environment injurious to the child’s welfare. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
Parental rights as they pertain to children and families are vast. [read post]
21 May 2010, 3:24 pm
JANE COLCA f/k/a ANSON VS. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
The legal complications surrounding Baby Veronica’s custody arose from an apparent conflict between the federal Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), a 1978 law designed to reduce improper removals of Indian children from their parents and their placement with non-Indian families, and South Carolina’s rules regarding the rights of unwed fathers. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Those states were Oklahoma in its code and in the case of In the Matter of Baby Boy L.[28] and South Dakota in the case of Matter of Adoption of Baade[29]. [read post]
19 Apr 2019, 5:59 am
The 2016 Guidelines provide that A[i]f the child may be involuntarily removed from the parents or Indian custodian or the child may be involuntarily placed, then ICWA applies to the proceeding. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Ct. 302, 148 L. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 3:50 pm
Family & Children’s Soc’y of Elizabeth, 72 N.J. 127, 132 (1976). [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 5:36 pm
Not inherited traits: children can look very different from their genetic parents. [read post]
18 May 2014, 12:33 pm
At the time of the death of F, K had two infant children and L had four infant children. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm
The parties’ 2018 stipulation of settlement required the use of a parenting coordinator to assist them in communicating with each other regarding the children’s health, education, well-being in welfare, and in making joint decisions for the children. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
We therefore hold that…the ICWA should not be applied to the present case in which the purpose and intent of Congress cannot be achieved thereby.[12] Kansas adopted the existing Indian family exception in 1982 in Matter of Adoption of Baby Boy L.[13] Baby Boy L. was born out of wedlock to a non-Indian mother and the putative father, a member of the Kiowa Tribe.[14] On the day of the child’s birth, his mother… [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am
August 2, 2023Appellate Division, First DepartmentAge 29 Law allows unmarried children through age 29, regardless of financial dependence, to be covered under a parent’s group health insurance policy In B.D. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 5:01 am
The government cannot condition a parent's right to raise her children on periodic home inspection unsupported by probable cause. [read post]
9 May 2007, 8:06 am
As before, custody matters are not to be decided by a jury. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
’s overnight stays at the marital homes and on vacation were always in a babysitter capacity with the children present, that R.L. slept in a room at the marital home assigned to her by the wife, and that R.L. always attended any social events in a babysitter capacity with the wife and children present. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Erin F. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
We therefore hold that…the ICWA should not be applied to the present case in which the purpose and intent of Congress cannot be achieved thereby.[12] Kansas adopted the existing Indian family exception in 1982 in Matter of Adoption of Baby Boy L.[13] Baby Boy L. was born out of wedlock to a non-Indian mother and the putative father, a member of the Kiowa Tribe.[14] On the day of the child’s birth, his mother… [read post]
