Search for: "Independence Institute v. Williams" Results 61 - 80 of 616
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Roy Greenslade, also in the Guardian, described the closure as ‘another first for the Independent. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
From Gladstone to Thatcher: The Shortage of Parliamentary Time in the United Kingdom and the Implications for Tax Legislation – and BeyondJohn H N Pearce (Formerly HMRC; Associate of the Institute of Taxation, UK)5. 'The normal meaning of securities is not open to doubt'; Viscount Cave in Singer v Williams (1920). [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 2:28 pm by Andrew Hamm
Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
At Cornell University Law School’s Legal Information Institute, Gerard Salvatore also provides a preview. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
At his Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen weighs in on the election law case, Independence Institute v. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Nevertheless, neither of those justices recused themselves in the case of Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:29 pm by Lyle Denniston
  He will share 10 minutes of time with William M. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm by INFORRM
  The first full week of term will see the hand down on Wednesday 12 June 2019 by the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge, and Briggs) of its long awaited judgment in the “serious harm” case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
11 Sep 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
But these voices did not shape the institutions that are the most significant barriers to the anti-oligarchy constitution today, such as the Senate, the Supreme Court, and the Article V amendment process. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 12:24 pm by Roderick Hills - Guest
United States by Roderick Hills, Jr., William T. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 10:33 am by Vivian Persand
William Feist testified that the defendants, in the mid to late 1990s, instituted “unethical” policies such as round table claim reviews designed for the purpose of achieving a net termination ratio (the ratio of the value of terminated claims compared with new claims). [read post]