Search for: "Independent Acceptance Co. v. California"
Results 1 - 20
of 422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2011, 3:25 am
., Co. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 12:01 pm
In a recently decided California of Appeals case, Housing Group v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 11:05 am
Trader Joe’s Co., 20 Cal. [read post]
30 Apr 2023, 2:06 pm
Labor Law Arbitration Independent Contractor v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
Jubelirer (in 2004) and Gaffney v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 6:46 am
Co. v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 6:30 am
Francois and his co-counsel, the much more experienced civil rights litigator Loren Miller, used the case to attack Plessy v. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 4:37 am
KUCIEMBA v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 8:32 am
American Income Life Insurance Co., No. 18-cv-06364 (N.D. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 5:31 am
Co., 7-10517 (D. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 5:12 am
The court cited the McCann v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 4:51 am
It was thought that everyone was on the same team, even though it was clear from disclosures and other communications that the lawyer hired by the carrier was the lawyer for the carrier.This assumption was, and is, erroneous.As reported this morning in WorkCompCentral news, a pair of state supreme court cases from Montana and Texas are making a distinction between counsel for the carrier, the administrator, and the employer.Texas Supreme Court's decision last June in In Re XL Specialty Insurance… [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
The following facts, among others, can be relevant: whether the worker determines or can meaningfully negotiate the charge or pay for the work provided; whether the worker accepts or declines jobs or chooses the order and/or time in which the jobs are performed; whether the worker engages in marketing, advertising, or other efforts to expand their business or secure more work; and whether the worker makes decisions to hire others, purchase materials and equipment, and/or rent space. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 2:03 pm
Channel Lumber Co. (1997) 51 Cal.App.4th 1447, 1450; 2A Miller & Starr, Cal. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 11:09 am
Field v. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 9:01 pm
In Perry and United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 8:17 am
” California v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:01 pm
G who embraced ISL; in fact, Biskupic’s document revelation is evidence that there was a conscious decision by six Justices not to accept ISL (notwithstanding Justice O’Connor’s flirtations with the theory), and that the Bush v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 2:35 pm
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. [read post]
