Search for: "Independent Oil Well Cementing Co. v. Halliburton" Results 1 - 4 of 4
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Dec 2020, 11:52 am by CMS
The oil rig concerned was owned by Transocean and leased to BP, who contracted with Halliburton Company (“Halliburton”) for the provision of cementing and well-monitoring services. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 2:04 pm by Dennis Crouch
In Ex Parte Miyazaki, 89 USPQ2d 1207 (B.P.A.I. 2008), the Board of Patent Appeals revived the old precedent of Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 6:11 am by Dennis Crouch
In Ex Parte Miyazaki, 89 USPQ2d 1207 (B.P.A.I. 2008), the Board of Patent Appeals revived the old precedent of Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
" n117 The Supreme Court held the claim "invalid on its face" because of its functional language. n118 "The claim ... falls within the condemnation of the doctrine that a patentee may not broaden his product claims by describing the [*1429] product in terms of function" and "vividly illustrates the vice of a description in terms of function" in a claim. n119Similarly, in Halliburton Oil Well Cementing Co. v. [read post]