Search for: "Independent Producers Group v. Library of Congress"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2021, 4:00 am
Does this mean producers writ large or a specific or specified group? [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 7:30 am
The following is a guest post by Clare Feikert-Ahalt, a senior foreign law specialist at the Law Library of Congress covering the United Kingdom and several other jurisdictions. [read post]
10 May 2016, 10:21 am
The following is a guest post by Eduardo Soares, a foreign law specialist from Brazil who covers Portuguese-speaking countries at the Law Library of Congress. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
” {Mazer v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 1:16 pm
Garcia v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:28 am
We should also consider looking at existing ontologies and other systems, including Library of Congress and other popular and relevant systems used in law. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
United States In an interesting derogation from US copyright laws the Library of Congress granted an exception to the DMCA’s principles preventing the circumvention of technological measures in the archiving of software. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 1:12 pm
Pallante favored reorganizing the copyright office as an independent agency, which might have felt threatening to Ms. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 9:52 am
Hatch broke impasse: made sure there was a core group of stakeholders then a larger group of interested parties like libraries, reverse engineering researchers, law enforcement were allowed to comment.Band: 1201, 512, databases all happening together. [read post]
14 Jan 2021, 5:57 pm
Constitutional law experts offer differing opinions on the impact of the case, Brandenburg v. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 8:53 am
Co. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 3:48 am
The Library of Congress, which is the oldest federal cultural institution in the United States, describes the song as America’s “most powerful song. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 11:03 am
Engraving from the original painting by Alonzo Chappel [Library of Congress, Prints and Photographs Division]Sources: Adams, John. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
2 May 2016, 8:54 pm
YouTube v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 2:55 pm
The US Congress could plead ignorance in the 90s; legislators have no excuse today. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
The United States Congress debates bills for weeks, sometimes months, prior to passage, all of which you can see on the Library of Congress’ Thomas service. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
This is an issue for Congress and the president. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 8:19 am
Congress has previously responded to concerns regarding private copying in the context of library photocopying (through Section 108 of the Copyright Act) and home audiotapes (through the Audio Home Recording Act). [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
