Search for: "Indiana Bonding and Surety Co. v. State"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2012, 8:42 am
Until this case, it was generally believed in Indiana that a surety was barred from asserting pay-when-paid and pay-if-paid defenses under Midland Eng’g Co. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:21 am
In the Town of Plainfield v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:21 am
In the Town of Plainfield v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
Utilizing a different rationale, the court in Avon State Bank v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 3:19 pm
State of Indiana (NFP) Andrew Smith v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 10:00 am
Thus, the court held that the surety could assert all defenses to its principal (the contractor) including the pay-if-paid provision, and thus the surety was not liable under the payment bond. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
Unifund,[5] and the same is true of other states. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 5:00 am
Stat. (2019) states that a “lienor may not waive in advance his or her right to bring an action under the bond against the surety. [read post]