Search for: "Indiana Bonding and Surety Co. v. State" Results 1 - 8 of 8
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2012, 8:42 am by Jennifer Watt
Until this case, it was generally believed in Indiana that a surety was barred from asserting pay-when-paid and pay-if-paid defenses under Midland Eng’g Co. v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am by Kevin LaCroix
  Utilizing a different rationale, the court in Avon State Bank v. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 10:00 am by John P. Ahlers
  Thus, the court held that the surety could assert all defenses to its principal (the contractor) including the pay-if-paid provision, and thus the surety was not liable under the payment bond. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 5:00 am by Leonard Klingen
Stat. (2019) states that a “lienor may not waive in advance his or her right to bring an action under the bond against the surety. [read post]