Search for: "Indiana v. Kentucky"
Results 181 - 200
of 489
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2013, 1:55 pm
By my count, forty-two “topside” amicus briefs have been filed in the California Proposition 8 case, Hollingsworth v. [read post]
13 Oct 2006, 12:46 pm
Kentucky again. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:04 pm
Currently, 11 states, including Kentucky, Indiana and Michigan, have enacted laws that prohibit employer health plans from covering abortion. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm
In Moore v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 4:30 am
Baude v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 8:26 am
Lewis v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 12:55 pm
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, the abortion case, without hearing arguments. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 9:58 am
" State of Indiana v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am
Latif v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 pm
He was co-counsel on an amicus brief in support of the petitioners in Obergefell v. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 9:13 am
Indiana-Kentucky Elec. [read post]
In Pfizer off-label qui tam, Massachusetts District Court rejects broad implied certification theory
19 Sep 2010, 10:20 pm
Rost v. [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 2:10 am
Corp. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 12:45 pm
Within hours of the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana – Albany Division: U.S. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
The Sixth Circuit affirmed the applicability of the Kentucky “middleman” statute to a pharmacy in Flint v. [read post]
5 Sep 2024, 11:55 am
In recent years, district courts unanimously blocked bans in Arkansas, Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, and Tennessee, but the Sixth, Seventh, and Eleventh Circuit Courts of Appeals have allowed these bans to take effect. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 11:13 am
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky to assert that its decision used the rational-basis standard of review as pled by Planned Parenthood, and did not “implicate our cases applying the undue burden test [Casey] to abortion regulations. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:37 pm
Indiana, North Dakota, and South Dakota have aspirational goals; the rest have mandates. [read post]
