Search for: "Indiana v. Kentucky" Results 201 - 220 of 505
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Indiana – Albany Division: U.S. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 1:01 pm
  The Sixth Circuit affirmed the applicability of the Kentucky “middleman” statute to a pharmacy in Flint v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 1:37 pm by WIMS
Indiana, North Dakota, and South Dakota have aspirational goals; the rest have mandates. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 11:13 am by Helen Alvare
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky to assert that its decision used the rational-basis standard of review as pled by Planned Parenthood, and did not “implicate our cases applying the undue burden test [Casey] to abortion regulations. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:22 am by Matt Sundquist
ACLU of Kentucky and Van Orden v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 2:45 pm by Sever | Storey
We serve clients on a national basis and have offices in Springfield, Illinois; Carmel, Indiana; Louisville, Kentucky; Dublin, Ohio; and Winston-Salem, North Carolina. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 6:15 am by Aurora Barnes
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. 18-1019 Issue: Whether a state, consistent with the 14th Amendment, may require an ultrasound as part of informed consent at least eighteen hours before an abortion. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 11:50 am
We will provide a link to the decision as soon as it is available. 10:10 - The Court has released the opinion in Indiana v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am by John Elwood
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., 18-483. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 9:46 am
This post examines a recent opinion from the Indiana Court of Appeals:  Slaybaugh v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, 18-1019 Issue: Whether a state, consistent with the 14th Amendment, may require an ultrasound as part of informed consent at least 18 hours before an abortion. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 6:15 am
The judge in that case, In the Matter of the Petition of Stratcap Investments, Inc. v. [read post]