Search for: "Indiana v. Kentucky"
Results 241 - 260
of 533
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2023, 12:33 pm
We have blocked bans in Arizona, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Ohio, and Utah. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:07 am
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. 19-816Issues: (1) Whether an abortion clinic may assert third-party standing on behalf of its hypothetical minor patients to challenge a statute requiring parental notice before abortion; and (2) whether Indiana may, consistent with the 14th Amendment, generally require lawyers for unemancipated minors to notify parents of court-authorized abortions, subject to judicial bypass upon a finding that such notice would be against… [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 7:29 am
An Indiana federal court decision, Harper v. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 12:11 pm
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky in light of June Medical. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., 18-8 Issues: (1) Whether a state may require health-care facilities to dispose of fetal remains in the same manner as other human remains, i.e., by burial or cremation; and (2) whether a state may prohibit abortions motivated solely by the race, sex or disability of the fetus and require abortion doctors to inform patients of the prohibition. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 9:05 pm
Beginning in 2012, Indiana, Michigan, Wisconsin, West Virginia, and Kentucky each adopted right-to-work laws over the course of five years. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 7:58 am
Kentucky’s usury law[1] limits interest rates on certain debts to 8% per year unless parties agree in writing to a higher rate.[2] In the HOA/COA context, Kentucky law specifically allows associations to charge up to 18% per year on past due balances.[3] Ohio has a similar 8% limit, while Indiana has higher limits. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 1:26 pm
Kentucky: Wildcats favored by 7 Our call: Kentucky 30-21 Result: - Army v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., 18-8 Issues: (1) Whether a state may require health-care facilities to dispose of fetal remains in the same manner as other human remains, i.e., by burial or cremation; and (2) whether a state may prohibit abortions motivated solely by the race, sex or disability of the fetus and require abortion doctors to inform patients of the prohibition. [read post]
23 May 2012, 2:24 pm
Supreme Court took up the case of United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 3:00 am
See [V. [read post]
18 May 2008, 10:03 am
Here is an Aug. 2, 2007 ILB entry about Kentucky and Indiana. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 11:38 am
Cooper Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 8:13 am
In Himsel v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 11:18 pm
The Eastern District of Kentucky rejected the Restatement provision addressing the scope of the duty to defend in Outdoor Venture Corp. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 11:18 pm
The Eastern District of Kentucky rejected the Restatement provision addressing the scope of the duty to defend in Outdoor Venture Corp. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 11:18 pm
The Eastern District of Kentucky rejected the Restatement provision addressing the scope of the duty to defend in Outdoor Venture Corp. v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm
Kethledge of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, and Kentucky-based Judge Amul R. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 8:08 am
Smith v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and if so how it is applied, careful… [read post]
