Search for: "Indiana v. Kentucky" Results 61 - 80 of 505
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2010, 7:52 am by John Steele
 (h/t: Indiana Law Blog)  I think that everyone expected the decision to lead to a flurry of immediate appeals from non-citizens in jail, but it will take a while to see how it affects plea bargaining with non-citizens. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 9:37 am by Lorene Park
On April 26, the Kentucky Supreme Court reversed summary judgment in favor of an employer that fired an employee for keeping a gun in his car (Mitchell v University of Kentucky). [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:55 pm by Thomas Fisher
Fisher is the solicitor general of Indiana, which joined 14 other states and the governors of two states in an amicus brief supporting the administration in Trump v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 12:00 pm by John Elwood
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., 18-1019, is no longer being relisted and it appears the court is holding it for the Louisiana admitting-privileges case, June Medical Services LLC v. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 4:00 pm
Rokita (07-25), asking whether Indiana’s law requiring voters to show ID at polling places violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments, and in Kentucky Retirement Systems v. [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 10:40 am
In the case before the Indiana Supreme Court on Thursday in Indianapolis, defendant Jesus Arrieta is demanding that Indiana do what Kentucky does. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 1:18 am
While not a fraud case but annulment using bigamous marriage for its grounds, Thomas v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 10:25 am by lennyesq
 Read the full text of the decision Kentucky v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 11:56 am
The largest request came from James Tanford, a law professor at Indiana University in Bloomington seeking more than $80,000, including $400 an hour for legal work and $100 an hour for travel. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 4:43 am by James Romoser
Wolf reports that “[o]fficials in Texas, Ohio, Indiana, Kentucky and Oklahoma have in recent weeks argued that the high court’s narrow 5-4 ruling actually bolsters their defense of anti-abortion laws,” largely as a result of Chief Justice John Roberts’ concurring opinion in June Medical that arguably created a more deferential standard for courts to evaluate abortion restrictions. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:56 am
There's the new Supreme Court case, Kentucky v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 7:37 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court handed down its decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
8 May 2008, 8:28 am
On June 8, 2008 at 10am the Kentucky Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in Gaskill v. [read post]