Search for: "Indiana v. Kentucky" Results 161 - 180 of 542
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2019, 8:11 am by John Elwood
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., 18-483. [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:14 pm by Sital Kalantry
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky gave us a rare window into its politics. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:08 pm by Mark Walsh
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc. will dominate the attention of court-watchers more than anything that occurs in the courtroom today. [read post]
28 May 2019, 12:55 pm by Scott Bomboy
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, the abortion case, without hearing arguments. [read post]
28 May 2019, 6:13 am by Andrew Hamm
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky Inc., as well as opinions in three argued cases: Smith v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:12 am by John Elwood
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., 18-8 Issues: (1) Whether a state may require health-care facilities to dispose of fetal remains in the same manner as other human remains, i.e., by burial or cremation; and (2) whether a state may prohibit abortions motivated solely by the race, sex or disability of the fetus and require abortion doctors to inform patients of the prohibition. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am by Schachtman
Thus a federal trial court in Kentucky, applying Indiana law, granted summary judgment to a respirator manufacturer, on the basis of the sophisticated intermediary defense, in a post-OSHA asbestos lung cancer case.[11] Similarly, a Virginia state trial court, notwithstanding the application of Virginia law in the Willis and Oman federal cases upheld the sophisticated intermediary defense as a complete legal defense for asbestos sales after 1970.[12] The decisions in these asbestos… [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am by John Elwood
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, 18-1019, which involves a constitutional challenge to a statute requiring an ultrasound as part of informed consent at least 18 hours before an abortion. [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm by John Elwood
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., 18-8 Issues: (1) Whether a state may require health-care facilities to dispose of fetal remains in the same manner as other human remains, i.e., by burial or cremation; and (2) whether a state may prohibit abortions motivated solely by the race, sex or disability of the fetus and require abortion doctors to inform patients of the prohibition. [read post]
24 Apr 2019, 2:23 pm by John Elwood
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., 18-8 Issues: (1) Whether a state may require health-care facilities to dispose of fetal remains in the same manner as other human remains, i.e., by burial or cremation; and (2) whether a state may prohibit abortions motivated solely by the race, sex or disability of the fetus and require abortion doctors to inform patients of the prohibition. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
On 3 April 2019 the Supreme Court handed down judgment in the libel appeal of Stocker v Stocker ([2019] UKSC 17). [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 11:18 pm by Kirk Jenkins
  The Eastern District of Kentucky rejected the Restatement provision addressing the scope of the duty to defend in Outdoor Venture Corp. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2019, 11:18 pm by Kirk Jenkins
  The Eastern District of Kentucky rejected the Restatement provision addressing the scope of the duty to defend in Outdoor Venture Corp. v. [read post]