Search for: "Indianapolis v. Edmond"
Results 21 - 40
of 61
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2012, 5:32 am
And in Indianapolis v. [read post]
27 Oct 2013, 2:31 pm
People v Scott, Michigan Dept of State Police v Sitz, Indianapolis v Edmond, People v Jackson and People v Trotter settled that a roadblock or checkpoint stop is a seizure within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 7:12 pm
” Indianapolis v. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 10:12 am
In City of Indianapolis v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 2:23 pm
Supreme Court decision in City of Indianapolis v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 9:22 am
Sitz, Indianapolis v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 8:20 am
Despite Whren and a host of other Supreme Court precedents on this question, the Ninth Circuit held to the contrary based on a strained inference from the drug checkpoint case, Indianapolis v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 7:50 am
As a doctrinal matter, the decision in the case has proved to be notable, but not earth-shattering, acting (along with the same term's decision in City of Indianapolis v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 1:57 am
Edmond, 531 U.S. 32, 37 (2000); Abel v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 9:00 pm
Citing the Supreme Court case City of Indianapolis v. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 8:56 am
Of course, an actual drug checkpoint is unconstitutional - according to the Supreme Court in City of Indianapolis v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 7:23 am
Supreme Court in City of Indianapolis v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 1:30 pm
” City of Indianapolis v. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:35 am
This was later confirmed by the Court in City of Indianapolis v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
That is why, for example, the Supreme Court held in Indianapolis v. [read post]
1 Mar 2008, 5:05 pm
Edmond (2000) 531 U.S. 32, 54 (dis. opn. of Rehnquist, C. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 5:31 pm
Edmond, 531 U. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 12:20 pm
" City of Indianapolis v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 12:20 pm
" City of Indianapolis v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 9:26 pm
In 2000, however, the court ruled in City of Indianapolis v. [read post]
